Naturalistic Paganism

Naturalistic Druidry: A Retrospective, by WhiteHorse

Can we learn from past mistakes, in order to build a better future?

Yesterday’s article, entitled “What Do Druid Naturalists Do?”, explored the activities of the recently-defunct Druidic Order of Naturlists (DON).  This follow-up article draws insight from DON’s twilight, in order to build a better community for the future.

Sadly, since I wrote the original article about 3 years ago, the Druidic Order of Naturalists is no longer active.  However I would like to share some ‘lessons’ that I learnt from our ‘experiment’ with a naturalistic pagan group in the United Kingdom.

I still believe naturalistic paganism can be as coherent and viable as any form of  ‘religious’ or theistic paganism.  However to be an effective movement the naturalistic pagan must focus on the positive. The group has to be more than a platform for criticizing religious beliefs, pagan or otherwise.  It is easy for the naturalist to say what she doesn’t believe in without knowing what they are ‘for’ and what contribution they can make to wider paganism/society. Also while some naturalists have a deep personal disillusionment with religion, you should not let this become the main motivation driving the group. Read More

What do Druid Naturalists do? by White Horse

Druid's Temple, by Dr. Gilly Bean

What exactly is it that a Druid Naturalist does?

The following is an article excavated from the Druidic Order of Naturalists, which is unfortunately now defunct (though its website is still accessible).  While the Order may no longer operate, its legacy remains instructive for naturalists of all stripes.

This is a non-exhaustive and definitely non-compulsory list of things that some (but not all) members of the Order might be involved at any one time and which the Order can encourage and facilitate:

Naturalistic Ritual

  • Celebrating Nature and our fundamental connection and response to it, notably the seasonal festivals and cycles of nature familiar to most pagans. We wish to design and take part in rituals and celebrations that don’t require a belief in the supernatural but are yet evocative, profound and inspiring.
  • Celebrating the entirely made up festival of Yode (See below)
  • In the long term contributing to the development of alternative rituals for rites of passage from birth to death and developing celebrants to take part in these. Promoting humanistic and non-religious celebrants and rites of passage generally. Read More

The HPedia: Pagan

Your help is needed!  Please critique this entry from the HPedia: An encyclopedia of key concepts in Naturalistic Paganism.  Please leave your constructive criticism in the comments below.

There are generally four different uses of “Pagan” floating about, in order from most restricted to most broad:

  1. Someone belonging to a range of contemporary religions/spiritual paths inspired by pre-Christian Indo-European or Mediterranean traditions, though not necessarily attempting to recreate them exactly as they were. This meaning can be more precisely denoted by “Contemporary Pagan” or “Neopagan”, but Pagan rolls off the tongue better and serves as a nice shorthand.
  2. Someone belonging to such a contemporary religion or a historical person belonging to said pre-Christian Indo-European/Mediterranean traditions from those times, e.g. Roman polytheists of Classical times, Norse, Greeks, Egyptians, Indians, etc. This usage is somewhat anachronistic as the ancient peoples did not call themselves Pagan but were called that derogatorily by Christians in the late Roman era. Nevertheless, the term has been reclaimed by moderns and now serves to emphasize the link between those moderns and their spiritual ancestors.
  3. Someone belonging to a contemporary religion or path which shares certain things in common with Neopagans, such as an earth-centered nature-based path or an interest in the Occult. E.g. Gaians might be covered under this meaning.
  4. Anyone belonging to a non-Abrahamic religion.

HP used to use “Pagan” to refer primarily to the first two, and sometimes a little more inclusively to include the third, with the fourth being considered too broad to be of much use.  However, in 2013 popular opinion found this usage unnecessarily restrictive, so “Pagan” has now opened up to include the fourth meaning.

Halstead has analyzed Contemporary Paganism in terms of three partially-overlapping centers of interest, resulting in some tension and conflict in the community:

The 3 Centers of Paganism
The Three Centers of Paganism (adapted from Halstead)
As a matter of editorial policy, HP opts to capitalize the “P” of Pagan in most cases.  Rule of thumb: When in doubt, capitalize.

Recently, controversy has raged over the definition of “Pagan”, mainly as a matter of identity in the community.  Essential characteristics, as well as who/what to include or exclude have been central issues.  There have been notable debates over the appropriateness of Atheist Pagans and “Christo-Pagans” under the Pagan umbrella.

Check out other entries in our HPedia.

Truth and compassion: Which takes priority?

She Is Not Drowning; or, Truth Leaving the Well. Truth emerges from a well escaping the clerical hypocrisy and military force of the Dreyfus affair.  By Edouard Debat-Ponson, 1898

When push comes to shove, which do you value more – truth or compassion?

– by B. T. Newberg

In a recent guest post at The Friendly Atheist, Marcus Mann posed a question:

“I have to ask to what degree correctness crowds out other values important to me, particularly that part of me that strives to be kind… atheists need to be wary of valuing correctness over the much more important values of kindness, sobriety, and pluralism.”

In that spirit, I want to ask: Which is more essential to you, truth or compassion?

By truth I mean factual accuracy, fidelity to reality, or tracking what’s objectively “out there.”  I realize there are other kinds of truth, such as poetic truth, but today let’s stick to factuality.  By compassion I mean non-suffering, non-harm, or the promotion of well-being for others and yourself.

Most of the time these two enjoy happy agreement, but occasionally they may conflict.  In those cases, which takes priority?

Precedents in Paganism

The priority of truth in Paganism has precedent.  For example, the myth of matriarchal prehistory, though important to many and no doubt painful to give up, has largely been discarded.  So have many of the more fantastical notions about our past, thanks in no small part to the work of Reconstructionists.   Many polytheists today value accuracy of historical fact over fanciful invention, no matter how warm and fuzzy it may make one feel.  They draw a line (rightly, in my opinion) at the reality of the gods beyond which they will fight for their views vociferously.

The priority of compassion also enjoys precedent.  The principle of non-harm, encapsulated in the popular counsel “Harm none, do as you will”, puts the wellbeing of others on center stage, alongside the freedom to pursue one’s path regardless of what others may think.  Buddhism is also well-known for making compassion, alongside wisdom, one of its highest values. Read More

Love a Tree Day

Cherry blossoms in full bloom, by B. T. NewbergToday, May 16th, is Love a Tree Day.

Yes, it’s a real holiday (what a great idea, eh?).

Check out a list of the five best ways to celebrate Love a Tree Day.