Naturalistic Paganism

The mindfulness mindset, by Aaron Hernandez

In order for Mindfulness to work you have to be in a state of mind where you are able to focus your attention and be very much in tune with your own being. As a result, many counseling services in Sperryville VA or Counselors, Culpeper VA that train mindfulness techniques to others, also teach meditation techniques.

Most forms of meditation (and there are numerous techniques) involve the practice of concentration. You can either do this by repeating a phrase or a mantra over and over again or others prefer to focus on the sensation of deep breathing. Finally pursuits such as Tai Chi or Yoga are also a perfect vehicle for meditation because by their very nature, they can illicit the relaxed response and correct frame of mind you need. Once you are in a desired frame of mind, then mindfulness can begin.

So what exactly is mindfulness?

The idea behind it is that as we human beings are constantly multi-tasking and thinking about what we have to do next, we fail to pay attention to what’s going around us at that precise moment. By taking notice of the feelings, physical senses, and input from sight and sounds that are happening in the here and now, then it’s possible to learn to accept them for what they are without passing judgment. As a result Mindfulness can be a good tool for coping with issues such as stress and anger which is why many professionals from couples therapy in Sperryville VA to counseling services in Locust Grove VA practice and teach it.

Here’s how it works

Once you know how to establish concentration (through meditation) you are looking to simply observe all thoughts, emotions and sensations that enter into your body. This is done without judging them as bad or good. As you’re doing this you may also notice external sounds and sights such as a bird singing, or a tree swaying in the breeze, or the vivid colors of a flower in full blossom. In fact everything that makes up your experience in the here and now. The challenge is not to latch onto a particular sense, feeling or emotion, but to simply accept that it’s happening and observe what comes and goes. If you can manage to stay with the process as opposed to letting your mind wander off, then there’s a pretty good chance that the process will produce feelings of peace,  and a general calmness, thus aiding stress relief, worry and anger.

Used to its full potential, mindfulness is a very powerful tool and can be used in a number of situations. For example, when it comes to marriage counseling, Sperryville VA trainers often find that these techniques have a good success rate. In addition more and more Counselors, Culpeper VA and counselors in surrounding areas are adapting it to help other problem areas such as addictions, stress management and even conflict resolution.

The author

Aaron Hernandez: Professional Alternatives are a group of experienced psychologists in Virginia doing counseling practice. We as Counselors, Culpeper VA provide services like family counseling, marriage counseling and individual counseling for people seeking help on any sort of emotional or mental health issues.

Recent Work

Why is the ancient history of naturalism important to our future?  by B. T. Newberg

Emotional Pantheism: Where the logic ends and the feelings start, by Áine Órga

Meaning and truth, by Treeshrew

Next Sunday

Renee B.

What does the Wheel of the Year look like for a naturalist?  Here’s one person’s interpretation.

The Wheel of the Year for One Naturalistic Pagan, by Renee B.

Appearing Sunday, August 11th, 2013

The HPedia: Selfishness argument

Your help is needed!  Please critique this entry from the HPedia: An encyclopedia of key concepts in Naturalistic Paganism.  Please leave your constructive criticism in the comments below.

This is a proposed label for a common objection leveled against naturalistic ritual by some hard theists.  It criticizes naturalists for being “only in it for themselves”, “only concerned with what they get out of it”, etc.

To understand the argument, one must see it from a hard theistic point of view: deities being real, ritual is primarily for deities.  Focusing only on the benefits for oneself neglects the other.

The force of the argument relies on shaming the target for what is implied as selfish behavior.

Outside a hard theistic point of view, the argument quickly falls apart: if deities are not real (in the sense that hard theists mean them to be real), then there is no other to neglect.

However, even from a hard theistic point of view, the argument does not hold up: just because the divine is (supposedly) neglected does not mean ritual can only be for the selfish interests of the individual.  Ritual often effects social benefits by bonding groups together and orienting individuals toward enhanced social cooperation.  Further, it often motivates the individual to action toward environmental, humanitarian, or community goals.  Finally, it often develops the moral character of the individual toward increased empathy, compassion, humility, love, and other prosocial traits.  None of these effects can rightly be characterized as selfish, as they all extend benefit well beyond his or her narrow self interest.

For more on this issue, see the article Why do ritual as a Naturalistic Pagan?

Check out other entries in our HPedia.

Why is the ancient history of naturalism important to our future?

Die Venus von Willendorf, weitere Fotos und Informationen unter: http://donsmaps.com/willendorf.html

The truth is not ours to choose, but to discover.

– by B. T. Newberg

Does it matter whether naturalism is ancient or modern?  What difference does it make as we march toward the future?

The importance of naturalism’s history may not be immediately obvious.  After all, it’s what we do now that’s most important, right?  Yet the past holds the keys to our future.  There are at least three essential reasons why knowing naturalism’s ancient history is critical to moving forward.

This post is a follow-up to a previous post entitled Naturalism in prehistory?. Read More

The HPedia: Mental illness argument

Your help is needed!  Please critique this entry from the HPedia: An encyclopedia of key concepts in Naturalistic Paganism.  Please leave your constructive criticism in the comments below.

The “mental illness argument” is a proposed label for a dismissive strategy often employed against the religious.  The technique is simple: one finds some point of similarity between a religious behavior and a known mental illness, and proceeds to dismiss the religious behavior in its entirety.  This is a plain logical fallacy involving an over-generalization of similarity.  It seems structurally similar to the reductio ad Hitlerum: “comparing an opponent or their argument to Hitler or Nazism in an attempt to associate a position with one that is universally reviled.”

A response based on neuroscience is put forward by Whittle:

His [Patrick McNamara’s] book, The Neuroscience of Religious Experience, contains an exhaustive survey of the neurological research done in the field. In it, he describes three areas of investigation that have illuminated our understanding of the particular role that religious experience plays in the development of self: Neurological disorders and brain injuries; the operation of chemical agents on the brain; the neurology of religious experiences in healthy persons.

There is a remarkable consistency in all three areas of research. Persons suffering from temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE), schizophrenia, schizotypy, and obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) among other disorders experience a pronounced heightening of religiousness. Successful treatment for these disorders corresponds to a reduction in religiosity. The areas of the brain involved in these disorders represents a circuit of interacting nodes:

I believe that when taken together the clinical data suggest that the limbic system (particularly the amygdala), portions of the basal ganglia, the right temporal lobe (particularly the anterior portion of the medial and superior temporal lobe), and the dorsomedial, orbitofrontal, and right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex are the crucial nodes in a brain circuit that mediates religiosity. [The] circuit, in turn, is regulated by the mesocortical dopamine (DA) and various serotoninergic systems.

When this circuit is stimulated in the right way, you get religious ecstasy. When the circuit is overactivated, you get various forms of religiously tinged aberrations. When cortical sites (right temporal and frontal) play the leading role, you get ideational changes in belief systems and outright delusional states. When limbic and basal ganglia sites play the leading role, you get changes in ritual behaviors as well as increased interest in religious practices such as prayer and other rituals.

And what about healthy persons performing religious acts — prayer and glossolalia, meditation, reading the Psalms? Quite remarkably, the very same circuit of nodes are at play among the wide spectrum of religious activity and people. Rather than an indicator of mental disease, the data suggest that religious experiences represent something quite the opposite: they are part and parcel an aspect of ordinary human brain function. Neurological disorders experiencing extreme or dysfunctional religiosity appear to be malfunctioning nodes and/or interactions within the otherwise normal human circuit for religion.

Check out other entries in our HPedia.

Emotional Pantheism: Where the logic ends and the feelings start, by Áine Órga

Logically, I am an atheist. Emotionally, I am a pantheist.

I am the kind of person who does not really believe in anything unless it can be empirically proven in some way. I do have a lot of scope for entertaining theoretical constructs that can be logically laid out – I have an imaginative analytical brain, and I love to theorise and philosophise. And certainly, not everything that is even self-evident can be properly accounted for empirically. The universe as we know it and experience it is not by any means fully understood. But although there are theological and philosophical theories and intangible concepts that excite me and are meaningful to me, I’m not sure that I could be said to believe in divinity in any real way.

But when it comes to how I resonate emotionally, I have very strong pantheistic feelings. Although I may not see divinity as something that can even be defined, let alone proven, I feel as though the universe is divine. It is not something I believe in the way that I believe in science and physics and the physicality of my day-to-day existence. But it is something that I feel at my very core. It is an emotional response to awe, to beauty, to mystery. And that emotional response is very strong in me. Read More