
Enchanted Naturalism
As a form of naturalism, “enchanted naturalism” continues to be grounded in scientific discovery and empirical observation of the real world. Yet, it is committed to contributing to a meaningful dialogue between religion and science and to their potential rapprochement. Enchanted naturalism is open to spiritual interpretation. It infuses a mythopoetic language of reference into the scientific evidence it employs, and it seeks to transcend the objective and materialist answers with subjective, archetypal, and metaphysical concerns. Regarding this world as holy and alive (as “vibrant matter”), it highlights our spiritual connections to the cosmos. Anima mundi — the soul of the world — becomes revived. Read More
I went looking for the soul of modernity and surprisingly found it to be alive, although severely injured and in vital need of resuscitation.
Let me first comment on the “alive” characteristic of the soul of modernity. Read More
Many people have realized how natural it is to map our history onto the year, with the Big Bang at January 1 and today at December 31. The first time I saw this done was when Carl Sagan gave us his Cosmic Calendar in 1980. The beauty, elegance, and clarity of the Cosmic Calendar show in both the events brought to mind, as well a way it makes understanding Deep Time easy. We used the same approach here at HP in 2014, following Peter Adair’s Earth Story calendar. So for 2016, we’ll be looking to our Deep Time history for our themes.
Early Winter (Dec 21-Feb 2)
Cosmic event: The birth of the Universe to earth life on Earth
Theme: Possibilities & Potentials
Questions: With a very simple early Universe of energy, hydrogen, and helium, who could have guessed the wonders that surround us today? What amazing potential it had! In the same way, what potentials could our simple beginnings have? Or, what other possibilities have you seen in your life, either as part of Naturalistic Paganism or in other areas?
I find the vitriolic blogosphere debates between atheistic Pagans and hard polytheists exhausting and uninteresting. Like many of you, I think about the nature of deity, but I think the question itself is more interesting than the answers. Furthermore, relationship with deity is deeply personal and intimate. No surprise then, that in the very public discussion of the nature of deity among people who don’t know each other well, without the goodness of face-to-face communication cues like eye contact, facial expression, and tone of voice, many people’s personal boundaries are crossed and a lot of conflict results.