Naturalistic Paganism

Isis in Big History, Part 1: From the Big Bang to Agriculture

An Artist's Impression of Sirius A and Sirius B, by NASA

Evolutionary history makes sense of the appeal and transformations of the myth of Isis, including her association with Sothis (Sirius), the brightest star in the night sky.

– by B. T. Newberg

Last time, I ended with a controversial claim: For naturalists, myths are meaningless outside Big History.

Let that sink in – myths, including the deities of which they tell, are not real in and of themselves.

The reality of a myth comes from understanding what it really is: an evolving cultural entity embedded in natural history.

Without Big History, myths are quaint stories.  They become meaningful – in the sense of being consequential – only when placed in the network of causes and effects throughout history and daily life.

So, what does that look like?  To get an idea, let’s explore Big History from the perspective of a myth whose career has been particularly full of changes and transformations: the myth* of Isis.

The following is one way to tell the story in brief, emphasizing cognitive science and evolutionary approaches to religion.  Claims remain controversial and eternally open to revision.

This post is the first in a 4-part series exploring the myth of Isis in the context of Big History.  This is not a telling of the myth itself, but a context that reveals the appeal of different tellings throughout the ages.  For a proposal of Big History as naturalism’s narrative core, within which myths become meaningful, go here.

Isis of matter

Isis.  Image courtesy of Rev. J. Whitfield, from relief at Abydos.

Isis. Image courtesy of Rev. J. Whitfield, from relief at Abydos.

Isis’ story, like our own, goes all the way back to the beginning of time.  The conditions that set the stage for the myth of Isis give vital context for understanding it.

From a bright burst arose spacetime.  An inarticulate dust of light elements coalesced into stars; then from supernovae rained the heavy elements necessary for life.  Thus were set the conditions for all matter, including organic life and culture.

The sun and the star Sothis (Sirius), which appeared from Earth to rise before the annual flooding of the Nile, would later be seen as symbols of order and transcendence in connection with Isis.

On one planet (at least), certain large carbon-based molecules began replicating themselves.  Natural selection coaxed these into complex living organisms.  The generation of life would come to be seen as a key characteristic of nature, eventually symbolized by Isis.

Isis of life

Crucial to all but the most simple forms of life was the twin task of perceiving the environment and responding appropriately.  This let creatures avoid threats and exploit opportunities.  Thus, determining what’s real and what matters became urgent concerns.  The conditions for myths, which would later aid humans in these endeavors, were already set: they needed to be plausible as depictions of reality, and relevant in terms of moral decision-making.

In most cases, accuracy of perception was advantageous for living creatures.  However, other factors could be more important than accuracy if they led to greater reproductive fitness.  Thus, a practical depiction of reality was more adaptive than a factual one.

This affected one of the most important tasks: perceiving agents in the environment, such as predators hiding in the brush.  Creatures developed a hypersensitivity to agents, preferring to perceive beings in each movement of grass, even if it was only the wind, rather than risk missing a predator.  The practical value of this outweighed its factual inaccuracy.  This would later pave the way for the inference of invisible spirits and deities lurking in the natural environment.

Another development was the evolution of behaviors triggered by the perception of certain stimuli, with a stronger stimulus yielding stronger behavior.  The moth, for example, navigates by following the sun or moon, but is drawn astray when it encounters the much stronger light of a fire.  The imagery later employed by deities would take advantage of such supernormal stimuli by invoking larger-than-life figures of parental authority, power, and fertility.  All of these would contribute to the appeal of Isis.

Healthy, strong individuals made better mates, so some creatures developed costly ways of displaying their selling points.  Bower birds, for example, spend precious time and energy building “bowers” to attract mates.  It says, in effect, “I’m healthy enough to afford this expense.”  Among social creatures, those who could draw on group support made stronger mates.  To gain group support, individuals engaged in costly signals to distinguish themselves from free riders who might abuse group resources.  It implied, “I value the group enough that I’m willing to expend this.”  These behaviors would later manifest in humans as time and resources spent in displays of religious devotion to the group’s favored myth.

Isis of mammals

Cheetah nursing young, by DNDavis

Mammals developed an affective bond between mother and young, later leading to images of supernormal mother figures.

After the extinction of the dinosaurs, a branch of organisms called mammals rose to prominence.  They had developed complex emotions, which encouraged mothers to care for their young, and young to stick by their mothers, throughout an extended apprenticeship.  This would lay the foundation for empathy and a whole range of nuanced emotions evoked by myths.

The affective bond between child and mother, in particular, would later prove fertile for stories of supernormal mother figures such as Isis.

Isis of culture

A particular species of mammal developed language.  Stories were told, some more than others.  The stories changed to become more likely to be passed on.  Natural and cultural selection coaxed them into narratives increasingly well-adapted to human biology as well as psycho-social needs.

Stories featuring modestly counterintuitive agents, such as persons who could be omnipresent or weather patterns that could think and act like humans, balanced fascination with understandability.  Thus, they out-competed less interesting or understandable stories.  Tales of spirits and deities spread.

As human groups rose in size, they needed to find new ways to work together.  This was accomplished through stories.  Stories making a common authority seem sensible helped groups cooperate better than those without them.  Groups who could work together out-competed those who could not, so stories bolstering a social order, such as that of Isis, proliferated.

Isis of agriculture

Egyptian plow

Agriculture changed stories and how they spread.

Some groups learned to cultivate crops.  The ensuing change of lifestyle rewarded large families to work the fields, so their populations gradually out-bred those of hunter-gatherers and nomadic herders.  The stories of agricultural communities spread along with their peoples.

Meanwhile, the storage of grain surpluses created a tempting target for raids.  This, along with an expanding population demanding ever greater territory and resources, led to increased military needs. Stories justifying centralized authority became even more urgent.

Eventually, one agricultural people, that of the Egyptians, began to tell stories of a deity called Isis.

The series continues in part 2 with Isis’ myth as it adapts to meet the changing needs of humans throughout the Ancient period.  Part 3 follows the Middle Ages to the modern era, and Part 4 concludes with a look at how all this relates to the daily mundane life of one Contemporary Pagan.

*In HP, myth generally refers to historical traditions of stories, which have come down to us from specific cultures, and which involve pantheons of gods and sometimes other fabulous creatures and beings. For example: Greek myths of Dionysos and Persephone, Norse myths of Freya and Odin, Irish myths of the Dagda and Cerridwen, etc.  Loyal Rue sometimes use myth to mean a grand narrative or “narrative core”, but to avoid confusion I’ll reserve myth for the meaning above.

Upcoming work

This Sunday

B. T. Newberg

This one turned into a biggie!  I had to split it up into four parts, each exploring: How can Big History give meaning to a myth?

Isis in Big History, by B. T. Newberg

Part 1, from the Big Bang to Agriculture: Sunday, July 22nd, 2012

Part 2, from the Egyptians to Late Antiquity: Monday, July 23rd, 2012

Part 3, from the Middle Ages to the Modern Era: Tuesday, July 24th, 2012

Part 4, from the Cosmos to Daily Life: Wednesday, July 25th, 2012

Next Sunday

John H. Halstead

When the purpose of ritual is to listen to the unconscious, how can we consciously create ritual?

Pagan ritual as an encounter with depth, part 1, by John H. Halstead

Appearing July 29th, 2012

Recent Work

Neural love story, by Trent Fowler

Revering the universe, by Annika Garratt

Big History: A narrative core for HP?, by B. T. Newberg

Get our ebooks

B. T. Newberg ebooks

Upcoming work

This Sunday

Trent Fowler

Trent is back with another poetic mingling of art and science.

Neural love story, by Trent Fowler

Appearing Sunday, July 15th, 2012

Next Sunday

B. T. Newberg

How can Big History give context to a myth?

Isis in Big History, by B. T. Newberg

Appearing Sunday, July 22nd, 2012

Recent Work

Revering the universe, by Annika Garratt

Big History: A narrative core for HP?, by B. T. Newberg

The goddess Kali and Religious Naturalism, by Colin Robinson

Get our ebooks

B. T. Newberg ebooks

Henry David Thoreau’s birthday

Henry David ThoreauToday is the birthday of Henry David Thoreau, famed nature lover and author of Walden.  His impact on modern society is explored by the Center for American Progress:

Thoreau laid the foundation for modern-day environmentalism. He articulated a philosophy based on environmental and social responsibility, resource efficiency, and living simply that is as inspiring now as it was then. He believed that to live a good life we must keep the wild intact.

You can find a blog dedicated to daily Thoreau quotes here.

Revering the universe, by Annika Garratt

Alice Through the Looking Glass

“We are the universe observing itself.”

What does reverence mean?

  • Revere: “feel deep respect or admiration for” from re- (expressing intensive force) + vereri ‘to fear’.

So to revere is to feel respect, admiration, or even fear. How does one respect and admire the Universe?

Respect: “a feeling of deep admiration for someone or something elicited by their abilities, qualities, or achievements”. So to respect the Universe is to admire its abilities, qualities, or achievements.

Admire: “regard with respect or warm approval” or “look at (something impressive or attractive) with pleasure”. So to admire the Universe is to approve of the Universe, to be impressed with the Universe, to find the Universe attractive, and to be pleased by the Universe.

Out there is right here

How does one “look” at the Universe? We get the impression that the Universe is something “out there” and that we observe it as something distant through a telescope.

But the Universe isn’t something “out there”, it’s not distant at all, it’s “right here” it’s everywhere and everything. When we look around at the Universe, which is everything that exists, are we pleased by what we see? Are we impressed with what the Universe has achieved?

Who is it that we are delighted with? Who is the master craftsman? Who is the great architect of the Universe? Do we look at all that exists as though it has been “intelligently designed”?

Nature, Natura Naturans, is the great designer. Mother Nature is the one who gave birth to all this. Are we impressed with what she has created? Oh Nature, what a clever thing you have done.

Nature is not a distant maker, Nature is the Universe giving birth to itself. Nature is the Ouroboros eating it’s own tail, recycling itself, endlessly growing itself.

Does it do so mindfully? Or does it do so passively, without any purpose? Does it need a reason to do what it does? Do you ask a shrub why it is growing, what purpose there is to its growth and eventual decay? Do you admire a shrub for what it is doing, do you praise it for growing? Does the shrub need your approval, does it seek your admiration?

Like a child in wonder

We are the Universe observing itself. Our little brains are its little brains. All its little brains are looking at itself and trying to figure itself out.

The Universe looks at itself in the same way as a child looks at its own hands and feet. When children become self aware, they start to wonder what they are and where they came from. We tell the children that they came out of mummy’s tummy. What does that mean then, a Big Bang? And what was there before that?

The Universe observing itself is exactly as a child observing itself. When a child observes itself, does it praise its own limbs for growing? When a child cuts his or her knee, and watches the wound heal, does it feel admiration for what the flesh has achieved in patching itself up? Is the child pleased with the quality of its body? Does the child find itself attractive and praise worthy? Does the child respect its own body? Does the child fear its own body, or is the child concerned about the fragility of its own body?

Toward reverence

To revere the Universe is to look in the mirror and admire one’s reflection. Is the Universe beautiful? What does beauty mean?

Beauty is not just an outer appearance, it can also be an inner quality. We may listen to beautiful music, we may feel the texture of beautiful fabrics, we may admire the beauty of Truth and Love. To find something beautiful is to be pleased by it. To find something beautiful is to experience an emotion of pleasure.

To revere the Universe is to feel an emotion of pleasure upon thinking about the Unity of all that exists. This might constitute worship: “the feeling or expression of reverence and adoration”.

“If a necessary condition of worship is that it has to be in some significant sense “other regarding,” then worship would not on that account be inappropriate to pantheism. What makes it unsuitable is that worship, and especially prayer, are basically directed at “persons”—or at a being with personal characteristics separate and superior to oneself. ” (Metaphysics Research Lab, CSLI, Stanford University)

The author

Annika Garratt

Annika is an artist/illustrator from Bournemouth UK. She produces colourful mixed media artwork on canvas as well as fluid ink illustrations, often based on folklore and mythological themes. Annika sells original paintings on canvas as well as fine art prints. If you have any questions about Annika’s work, feel free to contact her by email. You can also find Annika at: