Naturalistic Paganism

Revering the universe, by Annika Garratt

Alice Through the Looking Glass

“We are the universe observing itself.”

What does reverence mean?

  • Revere: “feel deep respect or admiration for” from re- (expressing intensive force) + vereri ‘to fear’.

So to revere is to feel respect, admiration, or even fear. How does one respect and admire the Universe?

Respect: “a feeling of deep admiration for someone or something elicited by their abilities, qualities, or achievements”. So to respect the Universe is to admire its abilities, qualities, or achievements.

Admire: “regard with respect or warm approval” or “look at (something impressive or attractive) with pleasure”. So to admire the Universe is to approve of the Universe, to be impressed with the Universe, to find the Universe attractive, and to be pleased by the Universe.

Out there is right here

How does one “look” at the Universe? We get the impression that the Universe is something “out there” and that we observe it as something distant through a telescope.

But the Universe isn’t something “out there”, it’s not distant at all, it’s “right here” it’s everywhere and everything. When we look around at the Universe, which is everything that exists, are we pleased by what we see? Are we impressed with what the Universe has achieved?

Who is it that we are delighted with? Who is the master craftsman? Who is the great architect of the Universe? Do we look at all that exists as though it has been “intelligently designed”?

Nature, Natura Naturans, is the great designer. Mother Nature is the one who gave birth to all this. Are we impressed with what she has created? Oh Nature, what a clever thing you have done.

Nature is not a distant maker, Nature is the Universe giving birth to itself. Nature is the Ouroboros eating it’s own tail, recycling itself, endlessly growing itself.

Does it do so mindfully? Or does it do so passively, without any purpose? Does it need a reason to do what it does? Do you ask a shrub why it is growing, what purpose there is to its growth and eventual decay? Do you admire a shrub for what it is doing, do you praise it for growing? Does the shrub need your approval, does it seek your admiration?

Like a child in wonder

We are the Universe observing itself. Our little brains are its little brains. All its little brains are looking at itself and trying to figure itself out.

The Universe looks at itself in the same way as a child looks at its own hands and feet. When children become self aware, they start to wonder what they are and where they came from. We tell the children that they came out of mummy’s tummy. What does that mean then, a Big Bang? And what was there before that?

The Universe observing itself is exactly as a child observing itself. When a child observes itself, does it praise its own limbs for growing? When a child cuts his or her knee, and watches the wound heal, does it feel admiration for what the flesh has achieved in patching itself up? Is the child pleased with the quality of its body? Does the child find itself attractive and praise worthy? Does the child respect its own body? Does the child fear its own body, or is the child concerned about the fragility of its own body?

Toward reverence

To revere the Universe is to look in the mirror and admire one’s reflection. Is the Universe beautiful? What does beauty mean?

Beauty is not just an outer appearance, it can also be an inner quality. We may listen to beautiful music, we may feel the texture of beautiful fabrics, we may admire the beauty of Truth and Love. To find something beautiful is to be pleased by it. To find something beautiful is to experience an emotion of pleasure.

To revere the Universe is to feel an emotion of pleasure upon thinking about the Unity of all that exists. This might constitute worship: “the feeling or expression of reverence and adoration”.

“If a necessary condition of worship is that it has to be in some significant sense “other regarding,” then worship would not on that account be inappropriate to pantheism. What makes it unsuitable is that worship, and especially prayer, are basically directed at “persons”—or at a being with personal characteristics separate and superior to oneself. ” (Metaphysics Research Lab, CSLI, Stanford University)

The author

Annika Garratt

Annika is an artist/illustrator from Bournemouth UK. She produces colourful mixed media artwork on canvas as well as fluid ink illustrations, often based on folklore and mythological themes. Annika sells original paintings on canvas as well as fine art prints. If you have any questions about Annika’s work, feel free to contact her by email. You can also find Annika at:

Upcoming work

This Sunday

Annika Garratt

What does it mean to “revere” the cosmos?

Revering the universe, by Annika Garratt

Appearing Sunday, July 8th, 2012

Next Sunday

Trent Fowler

Trent is back with another poetic mingling of art and science.

Neural love story, by Trent Fowler

Appearing Sunday, July 15th, 2012

Recent Work

The goddess Kali and Religious Naturalism, by Colin Robinson

Sustainable communities: An interview with Alison Leigh Lilly

What are our root metaphors?, by B. T. Newberg

Get our ebooks

B. T. Newberg ebooks

Naturalistic Traditions for July

Summer Scrapbook

What can a naturalist celebrate in July?

Check out this month’s Naturalistic Traditions at Patheos.com.

Big History: A narrative core for HP?

Cosmos Revisited, by WeirdArts.com

The mythologies embraced by HP find their meaning within Big History.

– by B. T. Newberg

Last time, our poll uncovered the three most popular root metaphors of our readers:

  • nature-as-Creativity
  • nature-as-kin
  • nature-as-Big Self

This time, I propose Big History as the narrative core of all forms of Religious Naturalism, including HP.  Each of the three metaphors above find expression through this epic story.

This post is part 3 of a series examining HP through the lens of the work of Loyal Rue.  Part 1 is here, Part 2 is here, and an overview of Rue’s basic concepts is here.

What is a narrative core?

A narrative core* is what unleashes the power of a root metaphor, like a combustion engine unleashing the power of fuel.  The narrative unlocks the potential implicit in the metaphor.  It turns it into a story comprehensible and moving to human minds.

It’s not just any well-told yarn, though.  A narrative core is a story by which we understand all other stories.  It’s an epic within which all other stories are embedded.

Loyal Rue describes it in Religion Is Not About God:

The narrative core provides members of a culture with vital information that gives them a general orientation in nature and in history.  The narrative core is the most fundamental expression of wisdom in a cultural tradition – it tells us about the kind of world we live in, what sorts of things are real and unreal, where we came from, what our true nature is, and how we fit into the larger scheme of things.  These are all cosmological ideas…. But the narrative core also contains ideas about morality, about which things ultimately matter.  It tells us what is good for us and how we are to fulfill our purpose.

In short, the narrative core elaborates the power of the root metaphor to “render the real sacred, and the sacred real.”  The narrative cores of Abrahamic traditions, for example, are told in the Torah, Bible, and Quran.  Traditions without such explicit scriptures may relate their narrative cores implicitly through rituals, stories, histories, proverbs, and even daily interactions.

So, what is the narrative core of the many forms of Religious Naturalism, including HP?

Last time I argued the root metaphor of RN must be some view of nature, because naturalists explain things by reference to natural processes.  Likewise, it seems to me the narrative core must be some story about nature.  Further, since naturalism generally affirms the picture of nature as revealed by modern scientific method, that story must be informed by and consistent with current science.

So, here is my proposal: The narrative core of all forms of Religious Naturalism, including HP, must be some variation of Big History.

Big History

Also called the Epic of Evolution, the Great Story, or the Universe Story, Big History is the story of the cosmos gradually emerging from myriad lines of research across scientific disciplines.  It is a product of the consilience, or agreement, among the sciences on our common origins and nature.

It begins with the Big Bang, proceeds through the formation of stars and galaxies, and narrates the emergence of increasing complexity.  Physics gives rise to chemistry as atoms combine into molecules.  Then, chemistry gives rise to biology, biology to psychology, and psychology to culture.  We find ourselves at the latter end of that sequence (without implying any superiority), looking back at the great enormity of events that have led to this moment.  As Loyal Rue says, “we are star-born and earth-formed.”

The tale has been eloquently told by many.  Ursula Goodenough comes to grips with it in her deeply reflective The Sacred Depths of Nature (an excerpt of which is here).  Loyal Rue and E. O. Wilson play bard in their book Everybody’s Story, as do Brian Swimme and Thomas Berry in The Universe StoryMichael Dowd and Connie Barlow have much to say on it, and Glenys Livingstone incorporates its themes into her PaGaian Cosmology.  And don’t miss David Christian’s exciting TED Talk presentation, embedded below.

But… what does that have to do with me?

At a scale as large as the cosmos, it’s easy to lose sight of the human.  What do distant galaxies have to do with our everyday lives?

Although the universe dwarfs us, we are a part of it.  Notice how each system is nested within those preceding it (physics > chemistry > biology > psychology > culture), and all are ultimately nested within nature itself.  That means that we humans are a part of nature.  By understanding nature, we understand ourselves.

We also understand something of how to live by grasping the story of the cosmos.  All of nature’s systems are interconnected.  Any change can send reverberations throughout the whole.  Locally, everything exists in a delicate balance; disrupting that balance may catalyze new relationships unpleasant or even hostile to us.  So we ought to live in harmony with nature.

We learn, too, that nothing can be understood except by reference to everything else.  Beginning our story not at our birth but at the Big Bang brings perspective, and reminds us who we are, where we come from, and where we’re going.

Finally, if Big History still seems alien, maybe it’s because the story needs to be told all the way down to the human level.  After all, love, hate, and passion are no less natural than anything else.  Why you lost your job, how your spouse still loves you, and what you’re going to do with your life – all that is the cosmos in microcosm.  Each of our lives is a chapter in the ongoing epic of the universe.

One narrative or many?

At this point, some may be squirming at the thought of a single story informing all others – and rightly so, if that story were univocal.

Fortunately, Big History does not have one single form, like some kind of holy scripture.  Rather, it is multiple and fluid by its very nature.  As the sciences continue to debate and revise concepts based on new findings, Big History is always changing.

Furthermore, it can and must be told from different perspectives.  Since we are human, it is usually told from a human perspective, but one could also tell the story from the perspective of a tree or galaxy.  Big History is thus truly big.

The multivalence of Big History enables it to support a number of different root metaphors.

Multiple root metaphors?

Just as an engine can accept a number of different fuels, but not just any fuel, so a narrative core can accommodate a range of root metaphors.

Now we can return to the results of last time’s poll.  How can Big History express our three most popular root metaphors?

Nature-as-Creativity.  All this wondrous diversity that we see around us – where does it come from?  Big History reveals the universe as self-creating and self-organizing.  There is something astounding, magical even, about matter.  Far from inert, passive, stupid stuff, matter itself is creative.  Spacetime explodes into being at the Big Bang.  Evolution coaxes amino acids into life.  Life creates new environments for itself.  And a certain form of life even invents stories about it all.

All this happens without some transcendent architect meddling from the outside.  No, in Big History there is neither Creator nor Created, only Creativity.  If that’s true, we ought to value matter, including ourselves as material beings.  We ought to honor it through our own inspiration, in collaboration with all the other artists of the universe.

Nature-as-kin.  Who is our eldest ancestor?  It’s not a who but a what, says Big History.  Before there was male or female, there was the Great Grandparent, and it gave birth to itself in a great bright roar.  All of us are descended from the bang of that ancestor’s birth; all of us are related in one big family.  Locally, we know our cousins in the sky and earth, rivers and trees, eagles and worms.  No part of nature ought to escape our empathy, for family is family.

Nature-as-Big Self.  All of human history is but a flash in the long draw of cosmic time.  Who are we before the vast, deep cosmos?  Surely, we are but dust in the wind.  And yet, in another sense, we are the universe.

As Neil deGrasse Tyson puts it:

The very molecules that make up your body – the atoms that construct the molecules – are traceable to the crucibles that were once the centers of high mass stars that exploded their chemically-enriched guts into the galaxy, enriching pristine gas clouds with the chemistry of life.  So that we’re all connected – to each other biologically, to the earth chemically, and to the rest of the universe atomically.  That’s kinda cool.  That makes me smile.  And I actually feel quite large at the end of that.  It’s not that we’re better than the universe; we’re part of the universe.  We are in the universe, and the universe is in us.

Brian Swimme is even more succinct when he says, “Every child of ours needs to learn the simple truth: she is the energy of the sun.”

Everything is deeply interconnected.  On a fundamental level, the cosmos is one great being, one Big Self.  Big History is the story of that self.  Small as we are, we’re the whole tale from start to finish.  If that’s true, we ought to value nature – and all others within it – as we value ourselves.  And we ought to take responsibility for our part in nature, just as we accept responsibility for our actions as moral beings.

Wait… what about myths?

By now it is well worth wondering what happened to the mythology so central to HP.  Where are the stories of Zeus and Hera, Thor and fair-haired Freya?

This is where Big History becomes revolutionary.

Like Hesiod’s Theogeny, which wove the tangled strings of Greek mythology into one yarn, Big History weaves all mythologies into one fabric.  It does so by giving us the context by which to understand them.

Myths are cultural phenomena that have emerged, like everything else, from within the nested systems of the cosmos.  They are historically contingent and subject to evolution.  They exist symbiotically with the only organism linguistically capable of supporting them – humans.  They ensure their survival through adaptation, by appealing to human minds, and fulfilling functions in human lives.

This makes sense of mythology.  Its content is often strange considered out of context, but becomes plain when situated in its larger environment of human fulfillment.  Myths do something for us – they move us, they help us see nature and ourselves in a different light, and they inspire meaning.  In short, they enrich our lives.

Not everyone is so touched by mythology.  For some, they are no more moving than a list of cereal ingredients.  But for many, a great many, they are the blood of life.

HP is one path that facilitates an appreciation of and relationship with myth, without losing sight of its context in Big History.  We do not take the contents of mythology as literal facts.  Rather, we appreciate how such fictions help us experience truths about ourselves, each other, and nature.

*Loyal Rue also uses the term myth to describe a narrative core, but to avoid confusion with the specific cultural mythologies embraced by HP, I’ll refer to it only as narrative core.

Upcoming work

This Sunday

B. T. Newberg

What can Big History tell us about who we are and how we ought to live?

Big History: A core narrative for HP?, by B. T. Newberg

Appearing Sunday, July 1st, 2012

Next Sunday

Annika Garratt

What does it mean to “revere” the cosmos?

Revering the universe, by Annika Garratt

Appearing Sunday, July 8th, 2012

Recent Work

The goddess Kali and Religious Naturalism, by Colin Robinson

Sustainable communities: An interview with Alison Leigh Lilly

What are our root metaphors?, by B. T. Newberg

Get our ebooks

B. T. Newberg ebooks