

How do you maintain connection to the unconscious after ritual is created?
Pagan ritual as an encounter with depth, part 2, by John H. Halstead
Appearing August 5th, 2012

In a community like Contemporary Paganism, how do naturalists emerge?
How can a naturalist emerge in Paganism?, by B. T. Newberg
Appearing Sunday, August 12th, 2012
Pagan ritual as an encounter with depth, Part 1, by John H. Halstead
Isis in Big History, by B. T. Newberg – Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
Neural love story, by Trent Fowler
What can a naturalist celebrate in August?
Check out this month’s Naturalistic Traditions at Patheos.com.
Jungian-based Paganism begins with the proposition that the human psyche is not unitary. We are not one; we are many striving to become one. As James Hillman writes, “every sophisticated theory of personality has to admit that whatever I claim to be ‘me’ has at least a portion of its roots beyond my agency and my awareness.” Our conscious mind is only the tip of an iceberg which is largely unconscious. The unconscious includes the primal parts of ourselves as well as parts of ourselves that have been repressed. The goal of Jungian-based Neopaganism is wholeness, the integration of the unconscious and the conscious.
A Jungian-based Paganism uses ritual to facilitate this integration. In Jungian Pagan ritual, the contents of the unconscious (archetypes) are represented symbolically: as persons sometimes, but also as things, places, and events. The archetypes sometimes become the “gods” of Jungian Pagan ritual. As David Waldron explains, psychic development
“cannot be achieved through will or intention alone. People require symbols and rituals to express realities beyond the scope of conscious thought in order to achieve wholeness. The collective unconscious, the wellspring of intentional and unintentional thought is, by definition, unknowable and cannot be grasped within the confines of conscious rational intent. The mediation of symbols is required to give a person’s psychological development meaning beyond that of the purely rational. From this perspective, when a Jungian-oriented neo-Pagan utilizes ritual, it is a metaphor to describe psychic realities in relation to certain archetypes, within the collective unconscious […]”
However, the conscious nature of ritual creation raises an interesting dilemma. When the purpose of ritual is to listen to the unconscious, what role does the conscious mind play? Jungian Pagans seek to consciously and intentionally construct rituals for the purpose of integration of the psyche. But, according to Jungian theorists, psychic development cannot be achieved through conscious intention alone.
The reason is because the conscious mind is always trying to transform the contents of our unconscious into something more psychologically palatable, and in the process defeating the purpose of ritual. Jung wrote that, “Filling the conscious mind with ideal conceptions is a characteristic feature of Western theosophy […]. One does not become enlightened by imagining figures of light, but by making the darkness conscious.” We run the risk of “imagining figures of light” when our rituals are too much the product of conscious intention. When this happens, the ineffable archetypes are reduced to mere symbols*. Waldron explains that, when an archetype is reduced to a symbol which can be a consciously apprehended, it ceases to be archetypal. Although a symbol may masquerade as an archetype, it is a construction of the ego, and can become what Waldron calls “a collaborator in the suppression of the shadow.” In other words, when ritual symbols are a product of conscious intention, they not only fail to speak for the unconscious, but actually contribute to its ongoing repression.
How then is a new ritual to be arrived at? Edward Whitmont answers, “A genuine ritual, like a living symbol or a religious experience, cannot be fabricated; it can only be discovered.” Rituals are not invented; like our dreams, they happen to us. James Hollis echoes this formula:
“A rite is a movement in and toward depth. Rites are not invented. They are found, discovered, experienced. They rise out of some archetypal encounter with depth. The purpose of the symbolic act which the rite enacts is to lead back toward that experience of depth.”
Thus, for Jungian Pagans, the process of creation of the ritual is a collaboration with the unconscious. We can liken it to an artist being inspired by a muse (or possessed by a daimon).
Understood in this way, ritual is the product of a conscious form applied to unconscious content. Conscious design of ritual is unavoidable, or else there could be no “ritual” per se. However, to balance the conscious side of the equation, as it were, the Jungian Pagan seeks to draw the content from the unconscious. This can be done though meditation, dream work, what Jung called “active imagination” (which would be better named passive imagination), creative engagement with mythology, or by collecting what W.H. Auden calls “privately numinous words”, phrases, and images. These contents are then combined into a ritual form. Jung explains that the secret of great art (in which I would include ritual creation)
“consists in the unconscious activation of an archetypal image, and in elaborating and shaping this image into the finished work. By giving it shape, the artist translates it into the language of the present, and so makes it possible for us to find our way back to the deepest springs of life.”
How do we know if we have succeeded in tapping into the unconscious? Jung writes that the origin of a work of art can be seen in the work itself. A ritual of one’s own conscious intention and will can be expected to reflect the effect intended and “nowhere overstep the limits of comprehension”. But if a ritual is a product of the “alien will” of the unconscious, we find
“something suprapersonal that transcends our understanding to the same degree that the author’s consciousness was in abeyance during the process of creation. We would expect a strangeness of form and content, thoughts that can only be apprehended intuitively, a language pregnant with meanings, and images that are the best possible expressions for something unknown — bridges thrown out toward an unseen shore.”
Jung describes these as two different types of art, but it is probably better to think of them as two ends of a spectrum.
When I first began creating my own Pagan rituals, I did not feel authentic in performing the rituals, I felt a distinct sense that the rituals were lacking life of their own. I first attributed this to the newness and unfamiliarity of the ritual. However, I have come to realize over time that my early rituals, although drawing heavily on mythological symbolism, were overly cerebral, lacking in poetry and bodily movement. The most evocative rituals I have since created have been poetic creations, ones that seemed to come from somewhere other than my rational mind. They combined words that I had read or heard, which had a talismanic-like effect on me, with intuitive bodily movements. It is only at the end of the process that I would consciously apply structure to these contents to give the ritual a form. The result is a ritual that feels like, as Jung says, a “bridge thrown out toward an unseen shore”.
Next week in Part 2, I will discuss how I try to maintain the connection with the unconscious during the performance of the ritual.
Sources
Auden, W.H. “Making, Knowing, Judging”, The Dyer’s Hand (1962)
Hillman, James. Re-visioning Psychology (1975)
Hillman, James. “A Psyche the Size of the Earth”, Ecopsychology, eds. Roszak, Gomes & Kanner (1995)
Hollis, James. Under Saturn’s Shadow: The Wounding and Healing of Men (1994)
Hollis, James. Tracking the Gods: The Place of Myth in Modern Life (1995)
Jung, Carl. “The Philosophical Tree”, Alchemical Studies; Collected Works, vol. 13
Jung, Carl. “The Psychology of the Child Archetype”, The Archetypes and the Collective Unconscious , Collected Works, vol. 9, part i
Jung, Carl. “On the Relation of Analytical Psychology to Poetry”, The Spirit in Man, Art, and Literature, Collected Works, vol. 15
Tillich, Paul. “Symbols of Faith”, Dynamics of Faith (1957)
Waldron, David. Sign of the Witch (2008)
Whitmont, Edward. Return of the Goddess (1982)

John Halstead is a former Mormon, now eclectic Neopagan with an interest in ritual as an art form, ecopsychology, theopoetics, Jungian theory, and the idea of death as an act of creation. He authors the blog The Allergic Pagan.
Check out John’s other posts:
Get set for two weeks of ritual and the unconscious with John H. Halstead, author of The Allergic Pagan.

When the purpose of ritual is to listen to the unconscious, how can we consciously create ritual?
Pagan ritual as an encounter with depth, part 1, by John H. Halstead
Appearing July 29th, 2012

How do you maintain connection to the unconscious after ritual is created?
Pagan ritual as an encounter with depth, part 2, by John H. Halstead
Appearing August 5th, 2012
Isis in Big History, by B. T. Newberg – Part 1, Part 2, Part 3, and Part 4
Neural love story, by Trent Fowler
Revering the universe, by Annika Garratt

The evolving cultural entity of Isis exists in symbiosis with her devotees, meeting their needs in exchange for replication.
– by B. T. Newberg
Big History is the entire story of the universe. In the scale of cosmic time, human life can and perhaps should feel dwarfed – it puts us in perspective.
At the same time, the story is not complete till it’s told right down to the human level of individual daily life, else it is not relevant. Thus, this series concludes with how the story of Isis unfolds in the life of one Contemporary Pagan: myself.
This is the final installment in a series exploring the myth of Isis in the context of Big History. For part 1, tracing the story from the Big Bang to the rise of agriculture, go here. Part 2 is here, and Part 3 here. For a proposal of Big History as the narrative core of naturalism, including HP, go here.
Despite the prevalence of Isis in popular culture, I had no interest in her at all till one evening as I lied down for a “journey.” It was a technique from Michael Harner’s core shamanism*, my first introduction to Contemporary Paganism.
I followed the technique: visualize a spot in nature which leads downward, follow it down, then allow the spontaneous imagination to take over as you emerge into some new place. It becomes something like a waking dream. This is what came to me that evening:
I found myself falling down, down, deep down. Finally, I hit dirt in a place completely devoid of light. I could only feel around with my hands. It was a chilly, uncomfortable place which immediately suggested “underworld,” and “get out of here as quickly as possible.”
There in the darkness, a brilliant female figure, shining from within with bluish-white light, approached me. She wore a white Greek chiton or robe of some kind, and over her face was a white veil. A subtle wind lifted the veil up, but underneath was only more inky darkness.
The instinct to kneel immediately overwhelmed me. Never had I felt such a commanding presence, nor ever since. At the same time, out of compelling curiosity and naivete, I asked, “Who are you?” The glowing figure answered with a quiet, echoing hiss, “Isis.”
Later, I sketched the figure I had seen. For some reason, I felt moved to depict her offering her breast, even though it was not part of the original vision.
Over the next several days, I researched this “Isis” figure. Some elements of the journey appeared to check out, while others did not. The veil clearly linked with the historical veil motif ultimately deriving from an inscription at Isis’ temple at Sais. The offering of the breast linked with portrayals of Isis nursing Horus, carried over in the iconography of Mary and Jesus. These two elements “checked out.” However, other parts of the vision, including the Greek chiton, the cold underworld setting, and the figure’s aloof character, seemed inconsistent with Isis’ myths, closer to the Greek Persephone.
The simplest explanation was, of course, that I had been exposed to the veil and nursing motifs earlier without realizing it. Meanwhile, the Persephone imagery resembled a certain tarot card I owned. It seemed my mind had pieced together scattered scraps of mythology.
Nevertheless, the experience became profoundly meaningful to me as a personal vision. It perfectly symbolized my agnostic attitude toward religion, embodying the apparent impossibility of gaining knowledge of what lied “beneath the veil.” The more time went on, the more I kept returning to it and seeing new meanings in it.
I have found living with the myth of Isis rewarding, and it’s changed my behavior for the better. She plays on my human biology in order to meet my modern needs, and in return she gains replication.

Biophilia: We are instinctively attracted to the sensations of nature.
The myth of Isis exploits human biology in the ways recounted in part 1: through hypersensitivity to agents, supernormal stimuli, costly signals, the mammalian mother-child bond, a preference for modestly counterintuitive agents, and a need for large-scale group cooperation. In addition, the myth of Isis takes advantage of a few more features of my species.
Since she symbolized nature, I felt encouraged to spend time hiking, biking, and exploring the woods. The result was calm and joy, as often experienced by those who spend any length of time in nature. These positive feelings were then associated with Isis, increasing my bond with her. Thus, she exploited what E. O. Wilson calls biophilia, the “urge to associate with other forms of life.”
Isis’ association with the moon, in particular, became important to me. I timed my devotions to its phases, changing the robe adorning her statue to a color befitting the waxing, waning, full, or new moon. This caused me to spend time gazing at the moon, associating its natural beauty and glow with Isis, and her maternal nurturing love with it. I began to respond emotionally to the phases of the moon.
Mainstream Western society does not necessarily devalue emotion, but suffice to say Paganism places greater value on it as a source of deep meaning. It is no surprise, then, that an expanded, more fulfilling emotional life bonded me deeply to Isis.
The Christian idea of a transcendent deity with an exclusive claim to Truth no longer appeared plausible in an age of science and multiculturalism. The exclusively male image of deity as well as the devaluation of nature and the sensual body were sore spots, too. My needs were not being met by the Christian myth.
After a long period of searching, a new myth came along that was more fit for the environment of my heart and mind. Isis offered a vision in which nature, sexuality, and the feminine were sacred.
Moreover, her story appeared plausible, since I’d come to her by naturalistic routes. Having entered Paganism under the impression that myth and ritual manipulated inner psychological states, it seemed scientifically believable that devotion to her could make a difference in my life (I later learned this was a minority view in Paganism, but the “damage” was done: I had become a naturalist).
The way I lived my life began to change. Since Isis was, for me, embedded in a way of life (i.e. Paganism), integration of her myth had wide-reaching effects. Not only did I take up rituals and devotions, but my behavior toward the environment, society, and my own body transformed. The moon felt overlaid with emotional value, as did every tree and river. Hiking and biking became big parts of my life. I was motivated to clean up trash beside the river, often almost everyday. Family became important to me, as did learning the life stories of deceased relatives. Giving to charity was, for the first time in my life, a priority. Poetry flowed out of me. And my sexual body was no longer a bundle of urges to be pacified, but a wonder of nature to be explored.
All these concrete, empirical changes flowed, in part at least, from living with the myth of Isis. Put simply, my needs were better met.
Meeting my needs has paid off in dividends for Isis. As a cultural meme, her sole “interest” is the same as that of genes: replication. To propagate, she needs to leap from mind to mind, and she’s gotten me to help her do that.
By exploiting my biology and meeting my needs, she became so meaningful to me that I’ve felt moved to spread her story through artwork, poetry, conversation, and writing – including the present series of essays. I don’t proselytize, but I’m not shy about sharing either. Articulating a mythic path both scientifically plausible and morally responsible is quickly becoming my life’s work.
So, in evolutionary terms, she and I have developed a mutually-beneficial symbiotic relationship. She gets what she needs by helping me get what I need.
This symbiosis is surprisingly close to how ancient peoples viewed their relationship with deity: reciprocity. They made public offerings to deities in the belief that such pleased them, and requested blessings in return. The Romans formulated it as do ut des, or “I give so that you may give.”
Astonishingly, they were actually pretty close to the truth. Myths do need public displays in their honor, in order to leap from mind to mind. To encourage such behavior, they did bless humans, by helping them meet their needs. Reciprocity was unconscious symbiosis.
To conclude: What is Big History? It’s the tale of the whole universe, as pieced together through the best evidence of modern science.
What does that have to do with myths? Well, let me answer a question with a question.
Have you ever read a forum comment out of context, only to see it in an entirely different light when you go back and read the whole conversation? Myths are the same. They demand to be read in their natural context.
Myths are cultural phenomena that have emerged, like all other phenomena, through the unfolding of natural evolutionary processes. In this context, they bear the following features. Myths are:
When a myth becomes meaningful in one’s life, most of the reasons tend to be unconscious. There may be a sense of the myth “resonating”, or of feeling “drawn” to it. There may be some awareness of consistency with personal values.
The deeper underlying causes, though, are the myth’s exploitation of biology and meeting of bio-psycho-social needs. Ultimately, it’s a function of the evolutionary forces of Big History.
Thus, even everyday interactions with myths are part of the greater story of the universe. Without this context, myths may seem quaint at best. With it, myths become meaningful, consequential parts of nature.
Embedded in Big History, myths become real.