Naturalistic Paganism

Defy Superstition Day

Defy Superstition DayToday, September 13th, is Defy Superstition DayWeekendNotes.com says:

…if you’re one of the many who have superstitions you can’t seem to shake, this is the day you can let go of some or all of them by doing the exact opposite of what you’re told you should do regarding them.

They also give a few superstition-violating suggestions, which you may or may not have heard of:

  • volunteer around black cats
  • go out the same door you came in
  • pass someone on the stairs
  • change your sheets on a Friday

The HPedia: Synchronicity

Your help is needed!  Please critique this entry from the HPedia: An encyclopedia of key concepts in Naturalistic Paganism.  Please leave your constructive criticism in the comments below.

This notion, originated by Carl Jung, indicates an underlying pattern of meaning between events acausally related.

Synchronicity is the experience of two or more events that are apparently causally unrelated or unlikely to occur together by chance, yet are experienced as occurring together in a meaningful manner. The concept of synchronicity was first described in this terminology by Carl Gustav Jung, a Swiss psychologist, in the 1920s.[1]

The concept does not question, or compete with, the notion of causality. Instead it maintains that, just as events may be grouped by cause, they may also be grouped by meaning. A grouping of events by meaning need not have an explanation in terms of cause and effect.  (Wikipedia) Read More

A tropical rainforest ontology: In search of a non-reductive naturalism, by John Halstead

Olympic National Park #1, by J.G. in S.F.

Cahoone describes a complex non-reductive view of nature which might better be called a “tropical rainforest ontology”

Analytical philosopher Bertrand Russell wrote in “A Free Man’s Worship” that the world which science presents to us is purposeless and void of meaning, and our lives are nothing but the “outcome of accidental collocations of atoms.”  Similarly, Steven Weinberg explains in his book on the Big Bang, The First Three Minutes: “The more the universe seems comprehensible, the more it also seems pointless.”  These are bleak visions of reality.  But is such a reductive materialism the only option for naturalistic Pagans?

Deserts and rainforests

Lawrence Cahoone, author of Orders of Nature (2013), draws on the work of philosopher William Wimsatt to create a systematic understanding of reality consistent with modern science that leaves room for the human mind and the experience of meaning.  Ontology is the philosophy of the nature of existence or reality.  Materialists favor minimalist ontology, one which is, in the words of philosopher, Daniel Dennett, “clean-shaven by Ockham’s razor”, or one that is, in the words of analytical philosopher, W.V.O. Quine, suited to those with an aesthetic “taste for desert landscapes”.  In contrast, Cahoone describes a complex non-reductive view of nature which might better be called a “tropical rainforest ontology” (Wimsatt), because it describes reality in terms of a plurality of properties, rather than just one — matter.  Cahoone’s non-reductive ontology is built on two premises: First, mind and matter are just two of many ontological properties of nature; neither is foundational, and neither may be reduced to the other.  Second, these ontological modes or properties are emergent properties of complex systems in the evolution of the universe. Read More

The HPedia: Metaphor

Your help is needed!  Please critique this entry from the HPedia: An encyclopedia of key concepts in Naturalistic Paganism.  Please leave your constructive criticism in the comments below.

Metaphor is a key term in many naturalistic spiritual traditions.  Since myth in most cases is not taken literally by naturalists, it must then be figurative or metaphorical in some sense.  There are many ways to understand this relationship.

  1. One sense is as a straightforward literary device, as in poetry: “a figure of speech in which a word or phrase literally denoting one kind of object or idea is used in place of another to suggest a likeness or analogy between them” (Merriam-Webster)
  2. Another sense is as a means of imperfectly grasping what is otherwise incapable of being grasped by human minds.  In this sense, an ineffable reality is depicted by means of a symbol, such as a specific cultural deity, but without implying that this deity describes said reality perfectly or in its fullness.  Thus, many different deities may represent different aspects of one (or more) ineffable divine realities.  This sense plays a role in Jungian psychology, which distinguishes between allegories, the former consciously created and the latter emerging from the unconscious (see “Allegory” and “Symbol”).
  3. A further sense is as a key concept underlying and giving form to a grand narrative or worldview.  For this meaning, see “Root metaphor.”

Read More

Gaia as the Universe, by Áine Órga

Artist's Conception of a Terraformed Venus

“For me, Gaia became the All.”

In developing my own non-theistic or naturalistic spirituality, the issue of deity was one of the most difficult to address.

Nothingness

As I wrote in my first post, the idea of nothingness – or that which is beyond infinity – is something that really captures my imagination, and trying to contemplate it generates a very powerful sense of awe for me. I spent a lot of time thinking about what deity meant for me – I had turned to atheism when I decided that I did not believe in a creator or a conscious, controlling god, or any sort of being or entity in the way that most people seem to view deity. But in a philosophical sense, I found it hard to pinpoint whether there was some other essence that transcended these aspects which could be defined as “deity”. I eventually came to the understanding that for me, if there was to be such a thing as “deity”, it would be quite simply the essence of existence, or the force that propels it and makes it so. Read More