
Introducing: Naturalistic Traditions, a new column at Patheos.com (by yours truly)!
This column features seasonal celebrations, profiles of historical and contemporary movements, and ritual activities.
It’s a big step to expand into a larger venue like Patheos. It expands our exposure, promotes cross-fertilization of ideas, and raises awareness of naturalism. So please support the new column by tweeting, sharing, and liking it!
The first post explores the month of February from a range of sources including Neopaganism, PaGaian, Pantheism, Humanism, and Carl Sagan. If you’re looking for a naturalistic way to celebrate the glories of nature this month, look no further. Check it out here.
Also, if you have anything to add for the month of February, by all means share! If we all chip in, we can gradually build a robust calendar of naturalistic traditions. You can leave a comment either here or at Patheos.
Finally, we’ll have a special treat for the February Cross-quarter on the 4th (this Saturday) here on HP. Videos and excerpts from the PaGaian tradition will warm your winter day!

Winterviews concludes today. From the Solstice (Dec. 21st) till the next Cross-quarter (Feb. 4th), we’ve brought you non-stop interviews and other goodies from big-name authors. Missed some? Catch up on your reading with the links below.
The last of our Winterviews authors is none other than Professor Ursula Goodenough. It is still relatively rare to find a readable, moving, awe-inspiring narrative of science. From the dynamics of cells to human emotion, The Sacred Depths of Nature reveals the throbbing heart of the universe. Goodenough is not just a scientist, she’s also a storyteller. Today, she graciously shares with us an excerpt from her book.
I’ve had a lot of trouble with the universe. It began soon after I was told about it in physics class. I was perhaps twenty, and I went on a camping trip, where I found myself in a sleeping bag looking up into the crisp Colorado night. Before I could look around for Orion and the Big Dipper, I was overwhelmed with terror. The panic became so acute that I had to roll over and bury my face in my pillow.
The night sky was ruined. I would never be able to look at it again. I wept into my pillow, the long slow tears of adolescent despair. And when I later encountered the famous quote from physicist Steven Weinberg – “The more the universe seems comprehensible, the more it seems pointless” – I wallowed in its poignant nihilism. A bleak emptiness overtook me whenever I thought about what was really going on out of in the cosmos or deep in the atom. So I did my best not to think about such things.
But, since then, I have found a way to defeat the nihilism that lurks in the infinite and the infinitesimal. I have come to understand that I can deflect the apparent pointlessness of it all by realizing that I don’t have to seek a point. In any of it. Instead, I can see it as the locus of Mystery.
Mystery. Inherently pointless, inherently shrouded in its own absence of category. The clouds passing across the face of the deity in the stained-glass images of Heaven.
The word God is often used to name this mystery. A concept known as Deism proposes that God created the universe, orchestrating the Big Bang so as to author its laws, and then stepped back and allowed things to pursue their own course. For me, Deism doesn’t work because I find I can only think of a creator in human terms, and the concept of a human-like creator of muons and neutrinos has no meaning for me. But more profoundly, Deism spoils my covenant with Mystery. To assign attributes to Mystery is to disenchant it, to take away its luminance.
I think of the ancients ascribing thunder and lightning to godly feuds, and I smile. The need for explanation pulsates in us all. Early humans, bursting with questions about Nature but with limited understanding of its dynamics, explained things in terms of supernatural persons and person-animals who delivered droughts and floods and plagues, took the dead, and punished or forgave the wicked. Explanations taking the form of unseen persons were our only option when persons were the only things we felt we understood. Now, with our understanding of Nature arguably better than our understanding of persons, Nature can take its place as a strange but wondrous given.
The realization that I needn’t have answers to the Big Questions, needn’t seek answers to the Big Questions, has served as an epiphany. I lie on my back under the stars and the unseen galaxies and I let their enormity wash over me. I assimilate the vastness of the distances, the impermanence, the fact of it all. I go all the way out and then I go all the way down, to the fact of photons without mass and gauge bosons that become massless at high temperatures. I take in the abstractions about forces and symmetries and they caress me, like Gregorian chants, the meaning of the words not mattering because the words are so haunting.
Mystery generates wonder, and wonder generates awe. The gasp can terrify or the gasp can emancipate.
Reprinted with permission from:
Goodenough, U. (1998). The Sacred Depths of Nature. New York: Oxford University Press. Pp. 9-13.

Ursula Goodenough is Professor of Biology at Washington University. One of America’s leading cell biologists, she is the author of a best-selling textbook on genetics, and has served as President of the American Society of Cell Biology and of the Institute on Religion in an Age of Science. She and her family live in St. Louis, Missouri, and in Chilmark, Massachusetts, on Martha’s Vineyard. (bio text from Sacred Depths book flap, courtesy of Ursula Goodenough)

Winterviews is almost over! Last but not least, Professor Ursula Goodenough, author of The Sacred Depths of Nature, shares an excerpt from her awe-inspiring book. She narrates her experience of an overwhelming feeling of the universe reduced to mere facts, and how she overcame it.
Terror and mystery: An excerpt from The Sacred Depths of Nature by Ursula Goodenough
Appearing Sunday, January 29, 2012
It’s the Cross-quarter, the midpoint on the sun’s cycle between the previous Solstice and the upcoming Equinox. We recognize this day with traditions drawn from Naturalistic Paganism, Pantheism, and PaGaian.
Traditions for the February Crossquarter, by B. T. Newberg
Appearing Saturday, February 4, 2012

Last year’s critical discussions proved fruitful for clarifying what we need to work on in the coming year. What are the essential questions that keep coming up again and again, and how can we address them?
Four critical questions for HP, by B. T. Newberg
Appearing Sunday, February 5, 2012
Practice begets belief: An interview with Rev. Michael J Dangler, Druid
The call of the Immensity: An interview with Brendan Myers, philosopher, Part 1 and Part 2
Atheist-interfaith activism: An interview with Chris Stedman
Winterviews continues! From the Solstice (Dec. 21st) till the next Cross-quarter (Feb. 4th), we’re bringing you non-stop interviews and other goodies from big-name authors. Mark your calendar!
Contemporary Paganism is quietly hiding a revolutionary feature: it emphasizes practice over belief. In other words, shared participation in ritual activity is considered more important than shared doctrine. The term for this is orthopraxy, as opposed to orthodoxy, and it’s what allows a polytheist, a pantheist, and an atheist to come together around the same altar without a fistfight.
To learn more about this peculiarity, I interview Reverend Michael J Dangler, ordained priest of the Neopagan Druid organization Ar nDraiocht Fein (ADF).
“What is the relationship between practice and belief?” I ask.
“Practice begets belief,” he answers.
This is a radical statement. Most of us are accustomed to thinking that belief ought to beget practice: Why do ritual if you don’t believe in it?
What this standard view misses is the power of outward human activity to mold and transform the self. Our beliefs are based on our experiences, and only through experience – through doing – do beliefs emerge. Thus, Michael says (to paraphrase):
“It almost always feels like going through the motions at first, but the more you do it, the more the practice comes to reflect the beliefs that emerge.”
What’s key here is that the beliefs that emerge are not predetermined, and are always open to revision. ADF enshrines non-dogma as a core value, and beliefs are entirely up to the individual. How you interpret your experience is your business.
While the majority in ADF are probably polytheists, there is variety. I’ve even heard a former Archdruid joke, “I’m a Monday-Wednesday theist, and a Tuesday-Thursday atheist.”
This is a radically different approach to spirituality than the traditional dogma of Abrahamic religions. It may be more consistent with democracy, insofar as what matters first and foremost is that you vote, not who you vote for. It may also be more consistent with science, insofar as what matters most is that you employ good scientific method, not that you start with a particular theory.
In view of these considerations, I believe orthopraxy may have powerful implications for the Western religious landscape.
Find out what Rev. Michael J Dangler has to say about it in this audio interview.
Here’s what’s in store:
Rev. Michael J Dangler has been an Ár nDraíocht Féin: A Druid Fellowship (ADF) member for over 10 years. He is currently an ADF Senior Priest and a Grove Priest of Three Cranes Grove, ADF, in Columbus, OH. He currently serves as the ADF Clergy Council Preceptor, overseeing all formal clergy and initiate study within ADF. His academic background is in history and religious studies, and he has written several books on Druidry for ADF. His personal webpage is at http://www.chronarchy.com/

Rev. Michael J Dangler, senior priest of Three Cranes Grove of ADF Druidry, shares his stories of how doing spirituality begets belief (and not the other way around).
Practice and belief: An interview with Michael J Dangler, Druid priest
Appearing Sunday, January 22, 2012

Winterviews is almost over! Last but not least, Professor Ursula Goodenough, author of The Sacred Depths of Nature, shares an excerpt from her awe-inspiring book. She narrates her experience of an overwhelming feeling of the universe reduced to mere facts, and how she overcame it.
Terror and mystery: An excerpt from The Sacred Depths of Nature by Ursula Goodenough
Appearing Sunday, January 29, 2012
The call of the Immensity: An interview with Brendan Myers, philosopher, Part 1 and Part 2
Atheist-interfaith activism: An interview with Chris Stedman
What kind of Humanistic Pagan are you? by B. T. Newberg