

“We blow out candles on our birthday, not because we think some supernatural force will make our wish come true. We do it as a recognition of how far we’ve come in this journey called life, and we think about where we want to go”
Beyond showing a reverential attitude towards nature, I think of ritual as a type of jazzed-up positive thinking or artistic, useful, self-suggestion. The reverential attitude is present even in my rituals which are not nominally focused on a natural event.
Let’s face it – in the modern, developed, urban world, it is hard to feel connected to nature even though we all are. The fact that we talk about “nature” as if it were a separate setting is quite telling in this regard. Frankly, anything that reminds us of the natural world, from pledging support to an environmental NGO, to walking through a park to, yes, even symbolic representations of nature in ritual, are beneficial to my way of thinking. Sometimes it’s the only thing we can do depending on where we live.
Through ritual, I only try to influence events by influencing myself. For example, I did a ritual based on recognizing some harmful relationship patterns I had acquired and shedding them. It was beneficial, and if someone wants to call that a “purification spell”, more power to them. But it doesn’t involve a belief in a higher being. No Sabrina, Casper the Friendly Ghost nor the Charmed Ones. Just me.
And artistically I love rituals. They aesthetically please me. I love my candles and all of their beautiful colors. I love the smell of my incense. I love the smell of sage, the appearance of fresh camomile. I love watching the smoke rise from my iron cauldron. I love my rustic brooms. Among other things, they remind me of antiquity, which also makes me feel connected–a descendant from a long line of Homo Sapiens.
In a personality test given to me by a private counselor, I came out an INTJ according to the Jung types, and I tend to find it a pretty accurate description of my personality. One characteristic of those types is creating systems, and I also find it fun to establish correspondences – which may correspond with what others have done or not, maybe for aesthetic reasons or proven medical properties. And I can change them when I want to, because after all, it’s my self-expression and no one else’s.
In conclusion, I think we all do rituals in any case. We blow out candles on our birthday, not because we think some supernatural force will make our wish come true. We do it as a recognition of how far we’ve come in this journey called life, and we think about where we want to go.
And conceiving of where we want it to go is the first step in working towards making it go where we end up. That’s where the “magic” is, in my opinion.
I just try to apply it on more than one day a year.
Looking forward to others’ points of view.

AtheistWitch
AtheistWitch: I was born in the middle of the United States, but have been living in Europe for most of my adult life. I was raised an Evangelical Christian, but started to disconnect from my denomination at around the age of 16 when I realized I was gay. I only admitted to being an atheist around the age of 23. At some point, I started researching Wicca and Paganism in depth and liked most of what I saw, but didn’t want to give up my Atheism. Since Wicca’s symbols are nominally related to real natural events or aspects, I realized I didn’t have to. While I don’t consider myself a Wiccan, I today call myself a naturalistic, atheistic eclectic, solitary witch. I celebrate the wheel of the year, meditate, do rituals both complex and simple, strive towards better understanding of self and others as I try to be an ecological eater and walk through the greener parts around my area on a regular basis. It is an ever-evolving practice, one that attempts to remain scientifically and logically grounded, while at the same time involving a lot of humor and being very “me”.” Here is the link to my blog: atheistwitch.blogspot.com

What do we get out of ritual? AtheistWitch shares his personal take on the issue.
Why I love ritual, by AtheistWitch
Appearing Sunday, March 11, 2012

Should religious naturalists abandon all use of words like “goddess”, “god”, or “gods”?
In defense of “gods”, by B. T. Newberg
Appearing Sunday, March 18, 2012
The new Copernican shift: How science is revolutionizing spirituality, by B. T. Newberg
Understanding word use and how science relates to religion, by Rua Lupa
Nature shock, by B. T. Newberg

We are no more the center of consciousness than the center of the solar system. All the universe partakes of the same essential process of “knowing.”
– by B. T. Newberg
We are experiencing a new Copernican shift that is revolutionizing our spirituality. It is undermining our sense of humanity as something privileged in the universe, the sole possessor of “soul”, standing above the beasts and apart from the inert dust of soil. It is questioning our free will, our magical power to move ourselves amidst the billiard-ball jumble that moves everything else in the universe. Our spirituality will have to change to embrace this new vision of humanity.
The heliocentric model of Copernicus showed us that the earth is not the center of the universe, that we are not special but a humble, integrated part of a larger whole called the solar system.
Suddenly, the earth had the same status as any of the other planets, and behaved just like them. This at once undermined both the specialness of the earth as the focal point of the universe, and the specialness of the other planets as exalted, transcendent entities. Both were of the same stuff, and that required a tumultuous shift in spiritual understanding.
In just the same way, we are now beginning to understand that the human mind, the psyche, the “soul” even, is not special either. Neuroscience, cognitive psychology, evolutionary biology, organic chemistry, and a host of other lines of research are converging on an inevitable conclusion: we operate according to the same physical laws as everything else in the universe.
Consciousness, thought, emotion, meaning, value – all these are emergent properties of a particular arrangement of organic chemistry.
Just as extreme hardness emerges when carbon atoms assemble in a certain manner to form a diamond, so consciousness emerges when carbon assembles in another manner to form life.
Suddenly our dreams, hopes, and aspirations – all that we hold dear – appear as if at the mercy of chance meetings of molecules. There is a beauty but also a horror to this.
Are we really nothing more than a random coagulation of stuff? Aren’t we special?
Just as the earth is not the specially-privileged center of the universe, we are not the specially-privileged center of consciousness.
We may be unique on this planet – so far as we can tell, no other species has achieved our level of intelligence or aptitude for complex manipulation of symbols. But we are not special in how this came about. It’s all due to the same fundamental process.
Meaning is not unique to us. Even amoebae detect the effluents of decaying bacteria, and know this means food is near. On an even simpler level, atoms are constantly seeking to acquire a complete set of electrons, and they bond with nearby atoms to acquire them.
There is no conscious intention to do so, but somehow the atom “knows” to do it. This “knowing” is no more than physical laws in operation, yet it is different from human knowing only in the level of complexity and nuance of response.
An atom knows to acquire electrons, an amoeba knows to move in the direction of food, and we know to breathe the precious air that gives us life. We know to circulate blood in our veins, we know to fire the neurons that bring up a certain memory, we know to respond to the caress of a lover with increased heartbeat and burning desire, and we know to pose one possible course of action against another and call up all the relevant social factors in order to decide what to do. We know to recognize patterns in previous experiences, and extrapolate what patterns are likely to continue in what we call the future. We know, finally, that this whole process of acquiring knowledge, ever incomplete, implies that there is and probably always will be more that we don’t know.
In this litany of knowing, there is a clear progression from the simple to the complex, but it is all the same fundamental process. Consciousness creeps in gradually or all of a sudden, but it does not disrupt the essential process of knowing.
Our knowing, then, our thoughts, our dreams, our very experience of being, is not special. It is the knowing of animals, the knowing of plants, the knowing of amoebae, the knowing of carbon atoms, the knowing of all things that partake in this marvelous phenomenon called the universe.
We are not the center of the universe. We are not the center of consciousness. We are not the center of knowing.
Like people in the days of Copernicus, we may perceive this insight as a threat. We may react to it with fear and denial. But if, instead, we can learn to embrace it, we may discover something startling and new.
Our spirituality must evolve itself to incorporate this new insight. We are essentially one with our universe. Every entity in the universe is unique and different – there’s no denying that – but at the same time, on a fundamental level, they are the same.
I and my world are a single, seamless whole. Person and place are identical. The world “out there”, and the experience “in here”, are one.
Atoms are our brothers and sisters. All things in the universe behave exactly as we do, and we behave like them. We are at one with all things. We enjoy communion with each and every thing.
How could there be any deeper mystery than this?

Are we humans the only beings in the universe that can know anything? Are we really so unique, or are we part of a seamless web of universal knowing?
The new Copernican shift: How science is revolutionizing spirituality, by B. T. Newberg
Appearing Sunday, March 4, 2012

What do we get out of ritual? AtheistWitch shares his personal take on the issue.
Why I love ritual, by AtheistWitch
Appearing Sunday, March 11, 2012
Understanding word use and how science relates to religion, by Rua Lupa
Nature shock, by B. T. Newberg
Making stock, taking stock, by Bart Everson
What can a naturalist celebrate in March?
Check out the March post of Naturalistic Traditions, a column exploring naturalism in Pagan ways, at Patheos.com.