Naturalistic Paganism

Upcoming work

This Sunday

Erik Oakenshield

What are ley lines, and how might they interest naturalists?

The greater significance of ley lines, by Erik Oakenshield

Appearing Sunday, December 2nd, 2012

Thing on Thursday

Althing in Session, by W.G. CollingwoodThis week, Thing on Thursday asks:

Do you resonate with the term “Five +1”?  Is there a better term?

Next Sunday

Image of Donald Robertson

Can you be a modern Stoic and an atheist or agnostic?

Stoicism: God or atoms?  by Donald Robertson

Appearing Sunday, December 9th, 2012

Recent Work

Working ritual with the Center, by B. T. Newberg, part 1 and part 2

How should we behave toward the stories of myth? / Come comportarsi con i racconti del mito?  by Hilaria

The big White splotch, by B. T. Newberg

John Toland’s birthday

 

John Toland (November 30, 1670 - March 11, 1722), Irish philosopher.

The term pantheist was first coined by John Toland (1670-1721), whose birthday is November 30th.  Paul Harrison describes him:

 

Toland was the first modern pantheist to combine a religious reverence for the Universe, with respect for science, and a belief that everything is made of matter.  A pantheist, he wrote to the German philosopher Leibniz, was one of those persons “who believe in no other eternal being but the universe.”  When asked for a brief statement of his credo, Toland replied, “The sun is my father, the earth my mother, the world is my country and all men are my family.”

 

Which mythic pantheons resonate with you most?

2012 Thing on Thursday #10

The HP project is all about the marriage of science and myth.  By myth, I mean traditional stories usually involving supernormal beings, such as deities, ancestors, spirits, and so forth, such as Athena, the Dagda, or Gaia.  Such myths are typically organized into pantheons indigenous to a culture.  At HP, the general guideline has been to focus on pantheons from or inspired by Euro-Mediterranean cultures.

Our question today is twofold:

  • First, is our Euro-Mediterranean focus too narrow, too broad, or just right?
  • Second, which pantheons resonate with you most?

An explanation of the Euro-Mediterranean cultures zone and the rationale behind it follows the polls.

The poll options list only the most popular, broad-level pantheons.  There obviously many more in the region, and each option could well be subdivided into dozens of distinct pantheons.  Also, if your focus goes beyond the Euro-Mediterranean zone, then these options will be insufficient.  So, please specify other pantheons of your choice in the comments.

Please choose one.

Please choose up to three.

The Euro-Mediterranean cultures zone

Europe Physical Map, from Geology.com

The Euro-Mediterranean cultures zone: bounded on the west by the Urals, the south by the Sahara, and the east and north by oceans

As a reasonable starting point, a Euro-Mediterranean focus was chosen for HP.  There were two reasons for this.

The first reason was to preserve meaningful dialogue.   It seemed that allowing “Pagan” to refer to any non-Abrahamic religion stretched it beyond the breaking point; the cultures included are far too diverse to draw any meaningful conclusions about them.  Thus, it seemed wise to restrict “Pagan” to a set of inter-related cultures in close contact for thousands of years, occupying a Euro-Mediterranean geographical region roughly defined by the Ural Mountains on the East, the Sahara Desert on the south, the Atlantic Ocean on the west, and the Arctic Ocean on the north.

The other reason involved potential issues of cultural appropriation.  This has often plagued the Neopagan community.  Questionable incorporation of Native American and Hindu myths in particular have been problematic.  The boundaries of the Euro-Mediterranean region avoid most of the controversial hotspots.

The question now is: Is this Euro-Mediterranean focus useful?

About Thing on Thursday

Althing in Session, by W.G. CollingwoodThis post is part of a series of councils on matters vital to the future.  The name represents both the generic term for, you know, a thingie, as well as the Old Norse term for a council of elders: a Thing.

Each week from the Autumn Equinox until the Winter Solstice, Thing on Thursday explores a new controversy.  Participation is open to all – the more minds that come together, the better.  Those who have been vocal in the comments are as welcome as those quiet-but-devoted readers who have yet to venture a word.  We value all constructive opinions.

There are only a few rules:

  • be constructive – this is a council, so treat it as such
  • be respectful – no rants or flames

Comments will be taken into consideration as we determine the new direction of Humanistic Paganism.

So please make your voice heard in the comments!

Working ritual with the Center, part 2

Alchemist's Showroom, by H. Kopp-Delaney

Ritual acts, apparently pointless, activate unconscious mental processes to effect a change in consciousness.

– by B. T. Newberg

This is the second of a 2-part series exploring a new technique for creating special time and space.  Part 1 introduced the Center.  Now, this part details the technique and its basis in psychology.

How do you work ritual with the Center?

Star trails at Point of Rocks, by Howard's Astronomical Adventures The basic technique is to choose an appropriate focal point, mark it as the Center, and mindfully circumambulate it three times.  This may be supported with appropriate gestures, phrases, and/or hymns (see Samhain ritual script for an example).

While the technique is simple, a lot is built into it.

1.  Appropriateness

The choice of focal point should be appropriate, and this is twofold.

First, it means that it should be a real center of actual activity, which requires that participants think about the local ecosystem.  In what sense is the focal point a center?  Is it a tree around which diverse creatures gather, a well from which a community derives sustenance, or the pole star around which our earthbound perspective turns?

At the same time, appropriateness also means it should fit the intentions of the ritual.  This requires that participants link their intentions to the center.  For example, a ritual of new beginnings may circle round the starting point of a path, or a ritual of death round a field of crops recently cut-down.

When planning a ritual, you may spend hours, days, or even weeks getting to know the local area and finding the perfect spot.  Thinking about the land in this way will ground you in it, get your inspiration flowing, and make the ritual more concrete and meaningful.  Moreover, it will begin to shift the ordinary perspective of objects and interests toward a holistic perspective of relationships and symbols.

2.  Marking

When the ritual is about to begin, the chosen focal point is marked as the Center.  A rope may be girded round a tree, a stone set up in a field, a chalk sigil drawn upon the paved path, and so forth.  This may be elaborate or spartan, but whatever the marking, it should not eclipse but rather complement the native beauty of the Center.

This serves both practical and symbolic functions.  Practically, it makes it clear to all participants exactly where the Center is.  Symbolically, it acknowledges your relationship with it, by contributing something of yourself to it.  This meeting of self and other further establishes the bond begun by carefully considering the most appropriate location.

3.  Mindful circumambulation

Circumambulation means moving round the Center.  Whether this is done in a solemn procession or a musical dance is up to you.  Either way it should be done mindfully, three times.  At the end of the ritual, circumambulate once in the opposite direction to signal your mind to return to normal time and space.

Within the imagination, allow this center to become the Center, symbolic of every center in your life, and indeed every center in the cosmos.  Allow it to become a locus of inexhaustible interpretation, a source from which inspiration flows as patterns and relationships suggest themselves to you.

Allow any errant thoughts to pass by unheeded, bringing concentration gently back to the Center.

This may be supported with the use of ritual phrases calling to mind specific relationships while you circumambulate.  For example, the Samhain ritual script invokes three relationships of naturalistic transcendence.  The first time round, participants raise one arm to the Center and say:

This is the Center, around which all revolves.

It does not revolve around me, I revolve around it.

As I pass round, I affirm my place within the mind.

On the second time round, the phrase is repeated, affirming “my place within the community”, and finally, the third time round, “my place within the cosmos.”

Traditionally, Neopagans walk deosil (clockwise) when creating sacred space.  This mimics the motion of the sun as seen from an earthbound perspective in the Northern Hemisphere, where the sun traverses the southern sky.  When dissolving the space, they walk widdershins (counter-clockwise), which might be taken to represent a new perspective gained during the ritual.

How does the Center work with psychology?

Bokeh Spiral, by Eric WüstenhagenRepetitive symbolic acts such as these may appear pointless and empty at first glance to some.  However, recent research is unveiling how and why ritual appeals to the brain, such that it is found universally across cultures, in both religious and secular contexts.  As the following explains, working with the Center takes advantage of embodied cognition, Pavlovian association, and cognitive psychology to effect a change in consciousness.

On the most primitive level, circumambulation creates what historian William McNeill calls “muscular bonding” between the participants – moving together in time.  Synchronous movement creates the sense of a group superorganism, and begins the submergence of the individual ego within a larger identity.  Through such embodied cognition, the movement of the body shapes consciousness.

On a Pavlovian level, the triple repetition is significant.  Three is a number denoting completeness in Western culture, as well as diversity (triplicity as opposed to unicity). These cultural associations, drilled into us since childhood, constellate a desired mindstate by Pavlovian association.

Finally, on a cognitive level, mindfulness monopolizes or “swamps” working memory, leaving no room for mundane or intrusive thoughts, resulting in a slightly altered state of concentration.

Further, the fact that the procedure appears pointless, at least to the uninformed observer, and redundant, circling three times instead of one, is also significant.  Lienard and Boyer propose that observing apparently unnecessary steps signals unapparent danger to the unconscious mind, inferring perhaps that the rationale for the steps must be some potential threat known to others but not to oneself.

This activates a mental module they call the “hazard-precaution system,” which likely evolved to avoid poorly understood but lethal dangers, such as pathogens and parasites.  Following a custom of ritually avoiding corpses or washing after touching blood, for example, has its evolutionary advantages, even if unaware of the real reason why these actions must be performed.

What we’re interested in here is not why the hazard-precaution system evolved, but how we can put it to work for us.  Its activation arouses a special attentional state, producing a slightly altered state of consciousness.  It directs attention away from goals and toward the specific steps of the ritual, which are typically actions so automatized they become dead to awareness, such as walking.  The extra attention paid to walking in a circle three times revives the act, makes it fresh again, and thus encourages a sense of vividness and being “in the moment.”  Ritual cues, such as apparently unnecessary steps, can unconsciously trigger activation.  The resulting state of heightened awareness may significantly facilitate the emotional power and inspirational meaning of a ritual.

It is important to note that this system is unconscious and intuitive, part of what Daniel Kahneman calls System 1 thinking.  There is also System 2: conscious, deliberative thought, the effect of which is often to inhibit intuitive processes.  In this case, for example, a critical thought might question the rational necessity of circling three times, thereby inhibiting activation of the hazard-precaution system and forestalling the desired change in consciousness.  The question has merit, but gets in the way in the moment.  That’s why ritualists often recommend setting aside skepticism for the duration of the ritual.  Critical questions can and should be entertained before and after, but not during.  It’s not to quell criticism, but to allow intuitive systems to function effectively.

If all goes well, the technique should produce what theological language calls a sense of the “sacred.”

Toward naturalistic ritual

Hoag's Object, by Billy and LynnWorking ritual with the the Center can be used as a viable, scientifically-supported method of creating special time and space.  It’s home-grown from a naturalistic perspective, yet open enough to invite non-naturalist participation without making any feel excluded. It’s also untied to any specific cultural tradition, so that Spiritual Naturalists of all stripes may find it useful.

This technique is still very much in the experimental stage, so please offer your comments and constructive criticisms.

Working ritual with the Center, part 1

Universe in a magic drop, by H. Kopp-Delaney

Centers unite all around a shared focus.

– by B. T. Newberg

This is the first in a 2-part series exploring a new technique for creating special time and space.  This part introduces the key symbol, the Center.

Last Samhain’s ritual script experimented with a new technique for creating special time and space (i.e. sacred space): working with the Center.  In short, participants circumambulate a chosen focal point.  Sounds simple enough, right?

Now, let’s explore that a little deeper.  Why create special time and space?  Why propose new techniques?  What is the Center?

Why create special time and space?

Spiral Galaxy, by JSome1The ultimate goal of ritual is to reaffirm or change patterns of perception and behavior.  Creating a sense of special time and space is useful to that end.

Whatever the nature of time and space in an absolute sense, our experience of it is malleable.  Time can seem longer or shorter, space can seem larger or more vital, and both can acquire a sense of heightened significance, depending on our state of consciousness.  Time and space can at times appear special.

At those times, routinized behavior patterns are disrupted as the unconscious mind reevaluates the situation.  They are thus prime times for inputting new information into the system.  In short, the function of achieving a sense of special time and space is to signal to the unconscious mind that what is about to occur is significant, so that it privileges it henceforth in memory and behavioral decision-making.

To put this in theological language, it is to create space that is sacred, meaning “set apart.”  Ritual time and space is set apart as special and significant.

Why a new technique?

Spiraling, by Amy PalkoBut wait… what’s the point of experimenting with new methods to do this?  Aren’t we re-inventing the wheel?

There are already several well-developed techniques for creating sacred space in the Pagan community, such as casting a circle or opening the gates.  They usually speak in some way of moving between “the worlds”, and naturalists can easily read this as moving between states of consciousness.  Becoming familiar with these techniques is valuable for naturalists because it allows us to take part in rituals of various traditions, side-by-side with other Pagans in the larger community.  And if it works for you, then hey, why not use it?

At the same time, these techniques may leave something to be desired.  Their theoretical backings are highly metaphysical.  For example, the purpose of a circle is purportedly to keep hostile energies out or desired energies in.  Opening the Gates (a technique of ADF and its offshoots) is meant to enhance communication with deities, spirits, and ancestors.

While such theory need not intrude on practice, it leaves me wondering what it would be like to experiment with an entirely naturalistic technique, home-grown and inspired by patterns in nature.  Hence, I present: the Center.

What is a center?

3S0578, by Billy and LynnWherever you look, centers (small “c”) pervade nature.  There are literal centers, such as the atomic nucleus circled by its electrons or the star by its planets.  There are also figurative centers, like the watering hole encompassed by herds or the giant redwood by a mini-ecosystem of life.  At the most domestic, there is the hearthfire of the home.  At the most cosmic, there is the omnicentric origin point of the Big Bang (which is everywhere).  Centers are all around.

Crucially, a center only exists relative to what gathers round it.  Apart from that, it is meaningless.  Centers are inherently relational.

Thus, the distinguishing characteristic of a center is that it is a center of something.  It unites that something around a shared focus.  It is the nexus, source, or heart of a community.  And that is what makes it interesting as a pattern for ritual.

What is the Center?

"Grand Design" Spiral Galaxy M81, by Chris ChristnerThe Center (big “C”) is liturgical language for a real and symbolic focus of ritual activity.  It is real insofar as it really is what all participants are focused around, symbolic insofar as it reproduces greater patterns of nature.  Its role in ritual is to alter consciousness, calling forth the individual ego’s relation to the group and the cosmos.

Like all good liturgical language, the Center is suggestive more than indicative, evocative more than precise, so that each person can discover themselves in it.  Virtually anything can be discovered to be a center if you look closely enough, and that is the point: it’s everywhere, but it takes a shift in perspective to see it.

This essay continues tomorrow with Part 2, which details how to work ritual with the Center, and its basis in psychology.