

“Community isn’t about unity, it’s about solidarity, it’s about seeing some kind of relationship and having common goals.”
Winterviews continues today. From the Solstice till Imbolc, we’re bringing you non-stop interviews and other goodies from big-name authors:
Our first interview brings you a top journalist in the Pagan scene (if not the top journalist): Jason Pitzl-Waters of the wildly popular Wild Hunt blog, newly moved to an independent website. Jason discusses what it takes to forge community.
B. T. Newberg: You’ve served the Pagan community for a long time in various ways, not least of which is through the wildly popular Wild Hunt. Would you like to describe in your own words what you do?
Jason Pitzl-Waters: I am an advocacy journalist working for the interconnected Pagan community. That’s the center of what I do with The Wild Hunt. I am writing the site I had always wanted to read and providing a running snapshot of where we’re going, and the challenges we face getting there.
JPW: Shortly after 9/11 I remember looking for Pagan responses to that tragedy and had a hard time finding them. There were a few, but scattered, and often hard to find. Meanwhile, I loved The Witches’ Voice Wren’s Nest feature, but wished it engaged in more commentary and contextualization of the news links it so generously found and shared. I wanted a central place that would give me an understanding of where we were as a community, a place where I could find myself in the daily news.
So, in fits and starts, I started to do it myself. First with a project called “MythWorks,” which evolved (briefly) into “Pagan Thought,” and finally into The Wild Hunt. My goal, at first, was to prove that there was enough going out there to write something every day, several years later that mission has evolved into nurturing journalism for our community as a whole. During this process, I found that I had inadvertently radicalized myself on the subject of Pagan news and Pagan journalism.
BTN: What do you mean “radicalized”?
JPW: Sorry, I don’t mean “radicalized” in the traditional sense, just a bit of personal shorthand for “driven into action and out of apathy by a defining event.” That’s what I mean.
BTN: So you were looking for a place that would give an understanding of where we were as a community, and now here you are, the creator of just such a place. The perspective must be quite different now. What has the experience taught you?
My experience with the Wild Hunt, and in Pagan journalism generally, has taught me how precarious our notions of Pagan community and Pagan infrastructure are, and just how much work we have to do if we hope to preserve and build on those two concepts. It has taught me that our leaders, clergy, and activists are human, and have the same hopes, dreams, and personal failings as anyone else. It taught me that our engagement with younger Pagans is vital if we hope to see some of the organizations we love and depend on last another 20 or 30 years. It taught me that the very idea of Pagan journalism evokes feelings of deep ambivalence among some rather prominent people, but has also been whole-heartedly embraced by others.
Above everything, being a prominent figure within Pagan media has taught me that we need so, so, many more people interested in devoting their lives to the process of writing about what happens to us, and that Pagan journalism is far more vital in knitting together a “Pagan Community” than anyone might expect.
4. Vital indeed. I can only imagine Pagan journalism must encourage a sense of shared interests, and an identity that exists not in private meetings but in relation to the non-Pagan public. Maybe it suggests we’re evolving to a new stage in our community, beyond the “Pagan 101” courses to something more well-rounded. In that sense, Pagan journalism appears to do a great service to the community.
Yet, you also mention some “deep ambivalence” around the idea of Pagan journalism. Can you elaborate on that?
For many Pagans, especially among our elders, the relationship with the press has been problematic, at best. Sensationalism, distorted information, attacks, and general mockery had been the rule for many years. Even today, reality television treats Pagan religions as if they were a personality quirk, or subcultural pose, rather than a deeply held belief system.
Because of this, the mention of “journalist” can make some instantly withdraw, or become very cautious, even with a Pagan journalist. I’m now used to people telling me, in informal conversations, that the conversation we’re having is “off the record” with varying degrees of seriousness. I completely understand this impulse, as I understand its opposite, the elders and established figures who leap at any publicity, holding to the adage that there’s no such thing as a bad publicity. Like our Buddhist friends, I hope to walk a middle path here. Reiterating the importance of advocacy journalism within our interconnected communities, while also acknowledging that sometimes it’s better to tell a reporter no.
5. Right, people have gotten burned often enough in the past that they are suspicious. Makes sense.
To shift the focus a bit, what about this whole notion of a “Pagan community”… do you think any such thing exists? Conflicts continue to rage over whether the label “Pagan” even means anything anymore. Are we becoming so splintered that we’re fracturing into multiple communities with disconnected interests, or are these just growing pains in a process “knitting” us together more tightly (to use your metaphor)?
I think “Pagan Community” does exist, though the notion isn’t all that old. You could point to periodicals like The Green Egg as early signs that we were starting to think “big tent,” but I really think it’s Margot Adler’s “Drawing Down the Moon” that helped push the idea that all of these small and often isolated communities were connected in some meaningful ways. Since then, there have been plenty of debates over terminology, theology, who’s in, who’s out, but I think that barring growth at truly unprecedented rates we’re pretty much stuck with each other.
Further, I think those wanting to “jump ship” and not be seen as part of a “Pagan Community” (however you want to define that) haven’t reached numbers significant enough to damage the larger body politic. For now, just about every large Pagan organization, and most of the prominent authors, clergy, and activists, seem to want an interconnected community in some form. We all want to share a drink at PantheaCon (or any other large festival/convention) together, or at least most of us do.
Maybe Facebook is what’s keeping Pagan community alive?
Having said all that, I think too many of us have ignored important intra-faith conversations that need to happen regularly if we aren’t going to routinely alienate groups that we want to be part of our extended Pagan “family.” The most damaging thing we can do is take the participation of various religions, traditions, and groups in this community project for granted. We need to do the work, have real dialog, and take critiques of the dominant members of our community seriously.
Community isn’t about unity, it’s about solidarity, it’s about seeing some kind of relationship and having common goals. We won’t always agree, but so long as we keep talking to each other, keep listening to each other, I feel optimistic that there will be a Pagan Community for some time.
6. Solidarity, not unity… yes, I couldn’t agree more. At times it feels like the community is ripping itself apart, but it also seems that each in their own way is striving toward something firm enough to support that kind of solidarity. A sense of “legitimacy” was how Alison Leigh Lilly put it. In one corner you’ve got Recons and Hard Polytheists doing great work to promote historical accuracy and serious religious devotion, in another corner Eco-Pagans are working toward more genuine commitment to the environment, and in a third corner are Naturalists (like myself) working toward plausibility in light of mainstream scientific evidence. All these seem to pull in opposing directions, and some seem embarrassed or horrified by this lack of unity. Then again, as Heraclitus says: “From the strain of binding opposites comes harmony.”
In this dynamic mix, which can seem less like solid ground and more like churning lava, a sense of solidarity is vital. Pagan journalism is one way people can contribute to that. What other ways do you think are currently urgent?
Solidarity is nurtured by gaining perspective, by acknowledging that we do share goals. Yes, we have real differences that we should respect and work towards understanding, but that doesn’t change how we are perceived by those completely outside of our culture. Once there, you realize just how much we do share, and how much work there is to accomplish before we can eliminate the “umbrella” once and for all.
And maybe, once we don’t need that umbrella any more, we might find that we want to keep it for other reasons, reasons that move beyond shared problems and into a shared affection. I find that all the best ways to gain perspective is to lead a life of service, whether that be journalism, activism, interfaith, chaplaincy, community organizing, or simply doing your best to support your faith community as you see it.
7. A shared affection – yes, it’s ultimately that group bond that keeps communities together, and it may start with a perception of shared problems. For that, journalism seems key.
Well, to keep up on that journalism, we now have a new place to go. You recently made the switch to blogging on an independent website. Where can people find you now, and what do you have in store for the future?
You can now find me at: http://www.wildhunt.org, which is where I started before I moved to Patheos.com. As an independent entity I’m hoping to look towards building a truly sustainable Pagan media site. My successful Fall fundraiser was only the first step, with that money I’m going to pay my contributors, develop and highlight new voices, and ultimately, create something that will outlive my tenure on the site.
I’ve always been very conscious that there may come a day where I won’t be able to do The Wild Hunt any longer, whatever the reason. When that day comes, I want to know that I’ve created something that won’t evaporate in my absence. I want The Wild Hunt to become an ongoing resource for Pagan journalism, and Pagan thought, for generations to come.
Jason Pitzl-Waters: Since launching “The Wild Hunt” in 2004, Jason Pitzl-Waters has become one of the leading voices for analysis and insight into how modern Pagan faiths are represented within the mainstream media. In addition, “The Wild Hunt” has also conducted in-depth interviews with prominent figures within modern Paganism, academia, and religion journalism. Jason wants to raise the level of discourse and journalism on important issues within the modern Pagan and Heathen communities, while advocating a broader commitment to encouraging religious multiplicity and solidarity (where appropriate) with surviving indigenous and non-monotheistic faith groups.
In addition to his work with The Wild Hunt, Jason has also written for newWitch Magazine, PanGaia Magazine, Thorn Magazine, and Llewellyn Worldwide. He also maintains a weekly podcast entitled“A Darker Shade of Pagan” that explores underground music from a Pagan perspective.
Jason is a former Board of Director member of Cherry Hill Seminary, and is coordinating The Pagan Newswire Collective, an open collective of Pagan journalists, newsmakers, media liaisons, and writers who are interested in sharing and promoting primary-source reporting from within our interconnected communities.
You can contact Jason at jpitzl at gmail dot com.
Winterviews: The creative genius behind The Wild Hunt Pagan news source gives us insight into serving our community.
Solidarity, not unity: An interview with Jason Pitzl-Waters
Appearing Sunday, December 23rd, 2012.

Winterviews: Is Jung still relevant to modern psychology and spirituality? John Ryan Haule, author of Jung in the 21st Century, thinks he is.
Jung today: An interview with John Ryan Haule
Appearing Sunday, December 30th, 2012.
The generosity of the sun, with Brian Swimme
Winter solstice: A naturalistic ritual for the cosmos, by B. T. Newberg
Stoicism: God or atoms? by Donald Robertson
The greater significance of ley lines, by Erik Oakenshield
Winterviews begins today. From the Solstice till Imbolc, we’re bringing you non-stop interviews and other goodies from big-name authors:
To kick off our Winterviews event and celebrate the Winter Solstice at the same time, I could find no better way than with this video freely available on Youtube. Brian Swimme is the author of The Hidden Heart of the Cosmos and numerous other books.
Swimme delivers a passionate reminder of our debt to the sun, intoning:
“Every child of ours needs to learn the simple truth: she is the energy of the sun.” – Brian Swimme
We’re still here.
(Big surprise.)
Today marks the notorious “prediction” of the Mayan calendar that the world will end (or, some say, a new spiritual era will begin).
The so-called prediction is actually nothing of the kind. The Mayan calendar simply ends, with no mention of what is to happen afterward. Maybe some mathematician had a hot date to get to, and decided 2012 was as good a place as any to leave off work for the day.
The hysteria has caused frustration for scholars of Mayan culture:
“For the ancient Maya, it was a huge celebration to make it to the end of a whole cycle,” says Sandra Noble, executive director of the Foundation for the Advancement of Mesoamerican Studies in Crystal River, Fla. To render Dec. 21, 2012, as a doomsday or moment of cosmic shifting, she says, is “a complete fabrication and a chance for a lot of people to cash in.” (USA Today)
David Webster says in The Uses and Abuses of Mayan Culture:
The Maya, of course, would simply have begun another cycle, just as they did before, and their world would have gone on. Here’s my prediction: 2012 will come and go without the world falling apart (at least any faster than it is at present), and people will forget about this particular intrusion of the ancient Maya into our lives. Nevertheless, long after 2012 we will still be fascinated with the Classic Maya. We will continue to use and abuse them for our own purposes, and see our own fate as somehow linked with their own. Each generation gets the Maya it deserves, or thinks it wants.
What is noteworthy is not the uniqueness of this doomsday prophecy (it’s only one in a very, very long line of such predictions). Rather, it’s that many in the New Age and Pagan communities were taken in by it.
But despite the failure of the world to end, today is a great victory for those predicting doomsday. You see, we’ve known since the 50s that failed prophecies, far from dissipating believers, actually increase their numbers. The cognitive dissonance associated with it causes them to seek explanations and persuade ever more people they are right.
So… on with the predictions. What’s next?
2012 Thing on Thursday #13
Final poll of 2012
Ah, Pagan culture! Some revel in it, others are embarrassed by it. From incense to crystals, does any of it appeal to you? If so, which parts?
There is, of course, no way to fairly delineate what is and is not “pop”: one person’s pop is another person’s… not pop. So, this post doesn’t even try. Instead, it focuses primarily on material aspects of pop culture, the kind of things or services you might find available in a metaphysical shop.
Perhaps you could call it Pagan kitsch… or not. Your call.
Please share your thoughts in the comments.
This post is part of a series of councils on matters vital to the future. The name represents both the generic term for, you know, a thingie, as well as the Old Norse term for a council of elders: a Thing.Each week from the Autumn Equinox until the Winter Solstice, Thing on Thursday explores a new controversy. Participation is open to all – the more minds that come together, the better. Those who have been vocal in the comments are as welcome as those quiet-but-devoted readers who have yet to venture a word. We value all constructive opinions.
There are only a few rules:
Comments will be taken into consideration as we determine the new direction of Humanistic Paganism.
So please make your voice heard in the comments!